Thread overview
D support static foreach syntax
September 06
Even though the code compiles, the ide shows syntax errors in red. Not a big deal but maybe it should be updated to support the new syntax? It shows a big red blotch on the source map as if there was an error along with the red marks on the code.
September 08

On 06.09.2017 23:30, Psychological Cleanup wrote:
> Even though the code compiles, the ide shows syntax errors in red. Not a big deal but maybe it should be updated to support the new syntax? It shows a big red blotch on the source map as if there was an error along with the red marks on the code.

Well, static foreach is just released a couple of days ago...

Updating the parser should not be very difficult (this will remove the squiggly red lines), but tweaking the semantic analysis will be harder.
September 16

On 08.09.2017 09:20, Rainer Schuetze wrote:
> 
> 
> On 06.09.2017 23:30, Psychological Cleanup wrote:
>> Even though the code compiles, the ide shows syntax errors in red. Not a big deal but maybe it should be updated to support the new syntax? It shows a big red blotch on the source map as if there was an error along with the red marks on the code.
> 
> Well, static foreach is just released a couple of days ago...
> 
> Updating the parser should not be very difficult (this will remove the squiggly red lines), but tweaking the semantic analysis will be harder.

https://github.com/dlang/visuald/releases/tag/v0.46.0-beta1 has support to parse "static foreach", but no proper analysis yet.