March 03, 2013
On Saturday, March 02, 2013 09:36:37 Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> On Saturday, March 02, 2013 15:07:33 Sönke Ludwig wrote:
> > The "docs" target was just a quick draft added to have meaningful list of standard built types and hasn't really been tested. I'll fix it right away.
> 
> Ah. I thought that it was for generating the documentation with ddoc.

And I actually, I would have at least half expected for you to have the fancier documentation generation (ddox?) that you've been working on integrated into dub so that it would be trivial to set up a new project that uses it. Maybe that's what you're already working on with the docs target; I don't know. But that would be a good feature IMHO.

- Jonathan M Davis
March 03, 2013
Am 03.03.2013 08:55, schrieb Jonathan M Davis:
> On Saturday, March 02, 2013 09:36:37 Jonathan M Davis wrote:
>> On Saturday, March 02, 2013 15:07:33 Sönke Ludwig wrote:
>>> The "docs" target was just a quick draft added to have meaningful list of standard built types and hasn't really been tested. I'll fix it right away.
>>
>> Ah. I thought that it was for generating the documentation with ddoc.
> 
> And I actually, I would have at least half expected for you to have the fancier documentation generation (ddox?) that you've been working on integrated into dub so that it would be trivial to set up a new project that uses it. Maybe that's what you're already working on with the docs target; I don't know. But that would be a good feature IMHO.
> 
> - Jonathan M Davis
> 

It definitely is planned (I wanted to make it a different target "ddox" for now, though). I just simply had no time to implement it yet, but the next version will have it.
April 17, 2013
Hello,

I've sent pull request with fix of configurations/buildTarget support.
https://github.com/rejectedsoftware/dub/pull/65

Could you review it?

Best regards,
    Vadim
Next ›   Last »
8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
Top | Discussion index | About this forum | D home