On Monday, 4 March 2013 at 04:45:45 UTC, Brad Roberts wrote:

> Has this implementation been bounced off the w3c xml test suite?

I don't know, but the xml tests don't seem to be the those provided by W3C

http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~michael-rynn-500/d2-xml/d2-xml-dev/files/head:/test/xmltest/

On Saturday, 2 March 2013 at 18:42:13 UTC, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
> On 3/2/13, simendsjo <simendsjo@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Which can you recommend?
>
> I use ae's lite xml library:
>
> https://github.com/CyberShadow/ae/blob/master/utils/xmllite.d
>
> It's not a monster but thanks to UFCS I can easily extend it to do
> what I want. For some trivial xml parsing which I needed it was great
> (OTOH std.xml is a segfaulting monster).

Has anyone got any examples of using this library? Reading nodes, attributes etc.

Am 02.03.2013 09:03, schrieb simendsjo:
> Everyone says "Don't use std.xml", and there are several other libraries.
> Which can you recommend? (I haven't looked closely at any of them, just
> some links found by googling)
>
> https://github.com/adamdruppe/misc-stuff-including-D-programming-language-web-stuff/blob/master/dom.d
>
> http://svn.dsource.org/projects/xmlp/trunk/std/
> https://github.com/theredhead/red.xml
> https://github.com/opticron/kxml
> https://github.com/opticron/libdxml2
> https://launchpad.net/d2-xml

I'm using a port of tinyxml I did myself:

https://github.com/Ingrater/thBase/blob/master/src/thBase/tinyxml.d

Kind Regards
Benjamin Thaut