On 10/27/2014 6:54 PM, David Nadlinger wrote:
> On Tuesday, 28 October 2014 at 01:52:09 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
>> I'm not sure what happened here (and with the other OpenSSL pull requests), then:
>>
>> https://github.com/D-Programming-Deimos/openssl/pull/21
>
> The OpenSSL repo is not assigned to the Deimos team

It is now. I had thought that new repos were automatically assigned to the team, but apparently I have to manually add them.

> (and I wasn't previously part of it).

You've been for a while now.

On 10/27/2014 6:52 PM, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
> On Monday, 27 October 2014 at 18:37:34 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
>> On 10/27/2014 12:48 AM, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
>>> Before we add a bunch of more Deimos projects, can something be
>>> done about the turnaround for Deimos pull requests? Right now, it
>>> looks like the only way to get a pull merged is to ping you
>>> personally to merge it.
>>
>> There are 13 members of Team Deimos who can pull:
>>
>> https://github.com/orgs/D-Programming-Deimos/teams/team-deimos
>
> I'm not sure what happened here (and with the other OpenSSL pull requests), then:
>
> https://github.com/D-Programming-Deimos/openssl/pull/21

I'd add you to team Deimos, but I don't recall your github handle and it won't do a reverse lookup :-(

Please, guys, I'd really appreciate it if you'd use your names as github handles. You might think your handle is memorably associated with your name, but when there are 50 such I definitely lose the associations.

It'd also be nice if your avatar was a picture, so I'll recognize everyone at Dconf!

On Tuesday, 28 October 2014 at 04:19:48 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
> I'd add you to team Deimos, but I don't recall your github handle and it won't do a reverse lookup :-(

It's not that hard for the couple of core contributors: https://github.com/orgs/D-Programming-Language/people ;)

David

On 10/27/2014 9:28 PM, David Nadlinger wrote:
> On Tuesday, 28 October 2014 at 04:19:48 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
>> I'd add you to team Deimos, but I don't recall your github handle and it won't
>> do a reverse lookup :-(
>
> It's not that hard for the couple of core contributors:
> https://github.com/orgs/D-Programming-Language/people ;)

So it's CyberShadow, thanks for letting me know.

On Tuesday, 28 October 2014 at 04:19:48 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
> On 10/27/2014 6:52 PM, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
>> On Monday, 27 October 2014 at 18:37:34 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
>>> On 10/27/2014 12:48 AM, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
>>>> Before we add a bunch of more Deimos projects, can something be
>>>> done about the turnaround for Deimos pull requests? Right now, it
>>>> looks like the only way to get a pull merged is to ping you
>>>> personally to merge it.
>>>
>>> There are 13 members of Team Deimos who can pull:
>>>
>>> https://github.com/orgs/D-Programming-Deimos/teams/team-deimos
>>
>> I'm not sure what happened here (and with the other OpenSSL pull requests), then:
>>
>> https://github.com/D-Programming-Deimos/openssl/pull/21
>
> I'd add you to team Deimos, but I don't recall your github handle and it won't do a reverse lookup :-(
>
> Please, guys, I'd really appreciate it if you'd use your names as github handles. You might think your handle is memorably associated with your name, but when there are 50 such I definitely lose the associations.

Sorry about that. But I maintain/contribute to a lot of projects outside D, and I can't justify breaking the GitHub links to all those projects at this point. People in other communities also know me exclusively by my nickname, and not my real name.

And thanks for adding me to the Deimos team.

On 2014-10-27 23:27, Brad Anderson wrote:

> I'd prefer if the name Deimos were dropped as it's less intuitive than
> calling them by what they are: C bindings.

Or just "bindings". We can already bind to C++ as well, and Objective-C, hopefully not too far in the future.

-- 
/Jacob Carlborg

On Tuesday, 28 October 2014 at 04:19:48 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
> Please, guys, I'd really appreciate it if you'd use your names as github handles. You might think your handle is memorably associated with your name, but when there are 50 such I definitely lose the associations.

http://wiki.dlang.org/People

Searching for github users also works

https://github.com/search?q=Vladimir+Panteleev&type=Users

On 10/28/2014 12:39 AM, Martin Nowak wrote:
> http://wiki.dlang.org/People
>
> Searching for github users also works
>
> https://github.com/search?q=Vladimir+Panteleev&type=Users

Thanks for the info

On Monday, 27 October 2014 at 17:18:06 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
> On Monday, 27 October 2014 at 07:48:16 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev
> wrote:
>> On Saturday, 25 October 2014 at 20:49:26 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
>>> https://github.com/D-Programming-Deimos
>>>
>>> http://en.docsity.com/news/programming-2/free-libraries-for-everyday-work-in-popular-languages/
>>>
>>> These appear to have C interfaces, so should be tractable for D without too much effort.
>>
>> Before we add a bunch of more Deimos projects, can something be
>> done about the turnaround for Deimos pull requests? Right now, it
>> looks like the only way to get a pull merged is to ping you
>> personally to merge it.
>
> I personally consider Deimos legacy with addition of dub and
> would actively discourage anyone from using it or relying on it.

Isn't the "official" stamp worth something? If they all connected
up to dub anyway it seems like a win-win, if we can get pulls
merged quickly.

On Monday, 27 October 2014 at 03:08:17 UTC, Matt Soucy wrote:
> On 10/26/2014 12:21 PM, Sean Kelly wrote:
>> On Saturday, 25 October 2014 at 20:49:26 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
>>> https://github.com/D-Programming-Deimos
>>>
>>> http://en.docsity.com/news/programming-2/free-libraries-for-everyday-work-in-popular-languages/
>>>
>>> These appear to have C interfaces, so should be tractable for D without too much effort.
>> 
>> I think everyone has their personal favorites.  I'd love to see
>> someone sort out a version of Protobuf for D.  There's one for C,
>> but the generated headers would still have to be translated,
>> which isn't ideal.
> There's an implementation of protobuf in dub already: http://code.dlang.org/packages/dproto
> I should probably do some more work on it...
>
> </shamelessplug>

There is also one not yet in the dub repo:
https://github.com/opticron/ProtocolBuffer