June 04, 2012 Re: [Proposal] Additional operator overloadings for multidimentional indexing and slicing | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to David Nadlinger | David Nadlinger:
> Actually, I'd say its the other way round – opDollar rather corresponds to opDoubleEqualSign, as it simply describes the character used.
I agree. It's the opposite of the semantic names of the original
operator overloading set.
Bye,
bearophile
|
June 04, 2012 Re: [Proposal] Additional operator overloadings for multidimentional indexing and slicing | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to bearophile | On 04/06/12 15:38, bearophile wrote:
> David Nadlinger:
>
>> Actually, I'd say its the other way round – opDollar rather
>> corresponds to opDoubleEqualSign, as it simply describes the character
>> used.
>
> I agree. It's the opposite of the semantic names of the original
> operator overloading set.
You mean like the old opStar() (which meant deref), or like opBinary("+") ?
<g>
|
June 04, 2012 Re: [Proposal] Additional operator overloadings for multidimentional indexing and slicing | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Don Clugston | Don Clugston:
> You mean like the old opStar() (which meant deref), or like opBinary("+") ?
>
> <g>
I meant the even older ones :-)
Bye,
barophile
|
Copyright © 1999-2021 by the D Language Foundation