June 27, 2012
On 6/22/12 5:00 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> I tend to agree with all of this. I think that std.typelist looks very cool,
> but we need to make sure that it fits in well with what we want to do.

Agreed. FWIW I'm not all that enthused about std.typelist. D's tuples support random access and much of std.typelist hides that away and slaps a linked list interface on top of it. If the purpose were to also allow other "implementations" of typelists than D's tuples, then great, but that wasn't it. As such, std.typelist is little else than an exercise in reducing functionality without a corresponding redeeming benefit.


Next ›   Last »
1 2