On Thursday, 28 November 2013 at 16:24:34 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
> On Thursday, 28 November 2013 at 11:37:45 UTC, Jonas Drewsen wrote:
>> I definitely agree. In addition D has obtained some nice features since the definition of the std.net.curl API that I would liked have used back then.
>
> What are you thinking of there? I think plain old classes and delegates are a good fit for http stuff.

Indeed, the basic design for wrapping curl is not that bad I think. One thing that was not available was UFCS which I think could have made the API look a bit different.

Another thing that could have have affected the API is support for named parameters which is still not supported (and probably never will?).

/Jonas

Till we have such issues http://forum.dlang.org/thread/mailman.357.1384163617.9546.digitalmars-d@puremagic.com I think we should have native replacement.