February 19, 2015 Re: quick-and-dirty minimalistic LISP engine | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Bill Baxter Attachments: | On Thu, 19 Feb 2015 06:50:29 -0800, Bill Baxter via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
> If you weren't deliberately making a joke, you might want to google "milf".
no jokes, it's Serious Bussiness! do you think that our project architect will allow to build our own milf without googling? or our security team don't know that i want to share our milf? it's all Official.
|
February 19, 2015 Re: quick-and-dirty minimalistic LISP engine | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Ola Fosheim Grøstad Attachments: | On Thu, 19 Feb 2015 07:39:31 +0000, Ola Fosheim Grøstad wrote:
> That's quite ok. I enjoy just looking at D code by different authors to get a picture of how the language is used in real code. So thanks for sharing!
same for me. i have a habit of downloading various D libraries and poking through the source, even if i'll never need to use that library. it's interesting to see how people think, and sometimes i can steal a trick.
|
February 19, 2015 Re: quick-and-dirty minimalistic LISP engine | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to ketmar Attachments:
| On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 8:30 AM, ketmar via Digitalmars-d-announce < digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote: > On Thu, 19 Feb 2015 06:50:29 -0800, Bill Baxter via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote: > > > If you weren't deliberately making a joke, you might want to google "milf". > > no jokes, it's Serious Bussiness! do you think that our project architect will allow to build our own milf without googling? or our security team don't know that i want to share our milf? it's all Official. Okie dokie then. :-) Just wanted to make sure you knew what you were doing. But seems it's all under control. Don't mind me. You can go about your business. --bb |
February 22, 2015 Re: quick-and-dirty minimalistic LISP engine | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to ketmar | With master dmd I'm getting milf.d(2): Error: ';' expected following module declaration instead of is milf.d(2): Error: no identifier for declarator aliced milf.d(99): Deprecation: typedef is removed milf.d(223): Error: basic type expected, not ; milf.d(223): Error: no identifier for declarator int milf.d(352): Error: no identifier for declarator CellCons milf.d(352): Error: declaration expected, not 'body' milf.d(359): Error: found 'body' instead of statement milf.d(374): Error: expression expected, not 'body' milf.d(380): Error: expression expected, not 'body' milf.d(760): Error: expression expected, not 'auto' milf.d(760): Error: found 's' when expecting ')' milf.d(760): Error: found '=' instead of statement milf.d(795): Error: declaration expected, not 'if' milf.d(796): Error: declaration expected, not 'if' milf.d(799): Error: declaration expected, not 'for' milf.d(799): Error: declaration expected, not ')' milf.d(801): Error: declaration expected, not 'if' milf.d(802): Error: no identifier for declarator stloc milf.d(802): Error: declaration expected, not '=' milf.d(804): Error: function declaration without return type. (Note that constructors are always named 'this') Also, there was no alias usize = size_t; There is no typedef and body is reserved word. Here is what I got: https://gist.github.com/MrSmith33/9bedde7b0721a6b40666 |
February 22, 2015 Re: quick-and-dirty minimalistic LISP engine | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to MrSmith Attachments: | On Sun, 22 Feb 2015 10:40:24 +0000, MrSmith wrote:
> With master dmd I'm getting
>
> milf.d(2): Error: ';' expected following module declaration instead of
> is
that is exactly what i wanted. the only "vanilla" version is that in zip, the "aliced" version will not compile by vanilla DMD. didn't the line `module milf is aliced;` rings the bell? Aliced is still D, but with additions i found right for me. so you are right: Aliced doesn't need alias for `size_t`, it has `typedef`, `body` is not keyword in it and so on.
|
February 22, 2015 Re: quick-and-dirty minimalistic LISP engine | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to MrSmith Attachments: | On Sun, 22 Feb 2015 10:40:24 +0000, MrSmith wrote: p.s. do you know that `macro` is a keyword? and that it does nothing and TOKmacro is not used anywhere? ah, the hidden joys of D! |
Copyright © 1999-2021 by the D Language Foundation