Thread overview | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
March 31, 2015 [WORK] Bringing http://dlang.org/phobos/ in good shape | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
I'm looking at the dlang.org statistics and am seeing the top pages looked at are: download.html, changelog.html, and phobos/. The first two are nice, but http://dlang.org/phobos/ is in serious need of completion - many modules don't have a brief description. Could anyone make this their priority? Thanks, Andrei |
April 07, 2015 Re: [WORK] Bringing http://dlang.org/phobos/ in good shape | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Andrei Alexandrescu | On 3/31/2015 12:32 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: > I'm looking at the dlang.org statistics and am seeing the top pages looked at > are: download.html, changelog.html, and phobos/. The first two are nice, but > http://dlang.org/phobos/ is in serious need of completion - many modules don't > have a brief description. > > Could anyone make this their priority? Yes, Master: https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/pull/3155 BTW, the markup of this page sux. It uses $(BR) where it should be using tables. But that's fodder for a separate PR. This one just addresses the text. |
April 09, 2015 Re: [WORK] Bringing http://dlang.org/phobos/ in good shape | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Walter Bright | On 4/6/15 11:07 PM, Walter Bright wrote: > On 3/31/2015 12:32 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: >> I'm looking at the dlang.org statistics and am seeing the top pages >> looked at >> are: download.html, changelog.html, and phobos/. The first two are >> nice, but >> http://dlang.org/phobos/ is in serious need of completion - many >> modules don't >> have a brief description. >> >> Could anyone make this their priority? > > Yes, Master: > > https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/pull/3155 Yay, you managed to beat all contenders at it :o). Here's the looks: http://dlang.org/phobos-prerelease/ Just a few slots left. Continue the sprint? Anyone else? > BTW, the markup of this page sux. It uses $(BR) where it should be using > tables. But that's fodder for a separate PR. This one just addresses the > text. Agreed. Well at least it's not <br> :o). Andrei |
Copyright © 1999-2021 by the D Language Foundation