View mode: basic / threaded / horizontal-split · Log in · Help
November 13, 2012
Re: Compilable Recursive Data Structure ( was: Recursive data structure using template won't compile)
On Monday, 12 November 2012 at 14:28:53 UTC, Andrej Mitrovic 
wrote:
> On 11/12/12, Andrej Mitrovic <andrej.mitrovich@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 11/12/12, Don Clugston <dac@nospam.com> wrote:
>>> Yeah. Though note that 1000 bug reports are from bearophile.
>>
>> Actually only around 300 remain open:
>> http://d.puremagic.com/issues/buglist.cgi?query_format=advanced&emailreporter2=1&emailtype2=substring&order=Importance&bug_status=UNCONFIRMED&bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=REOPENED&bug_status=VERIFIED&email2=bearophile
>>
>
> Oh wait, that's only for DMD. It's 559 in total:
> http://d.puremagic.com/issues/buglist.cgi?query_format=advanced&emailreporter2=1&emailtype2=substring&order=Importance&bug_status=UNCONFIRMED&bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=REOPENED&bug_status=VERIFIED&email2=bearophile

Issue 8990 and 6969, both related to this thread and unresolved, 
are not in the list, so I suspect there's a lot more missing too.

PS: I could not figure out how to make a useful report using that 
bug report tool either.

--rt
November 13, 2012
Re: Compilable Recursive Data Structure ( was: Recursive data structure using template won't compile)
On Monday, 12 November 2012 at 14:28:53 UTC, Andrej Mitrovic 
wrote:
> On 11/12/12, Andrej Mitrovic <andrej.mitrovich@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 11/12/12, Don Clugston <dac@nospam.com> wrote:
>>> Yeah. Though note that 1000 bug reports are from bearophile.
>>
>> Actually only around 300 remain open:
>> http://d.puremagic.com/issues/buglist.cgi?query_format=advanced&emailreporter2=1&emailtype2=substring&order=Importance&bug_status=UNCONFIRMED&bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=REOPENED&bug_status=VERIFIED&email2=bearophile
>>
>
> Oh wait, that's only for DMD. It's 559 in total:
> http://d.puremagic.com/issues/buglist.cgi?query_format=advanced&emailreporter2=1&emailtype2=substring&order=Importance&bug_status=UNCONFIRMED&bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=REOPENED&bug_status=VERIFIED&email2=bearophile

NM, you were talking about bugs reported by bearophile. Back to 
sleep ...

--rt
November 13, 2012
Re: Compilable Recursive Data Structure ( was: Recursive data structure using template won't compile)
On 11/13/12, Rob T <rob@ucora.com> wrote:
> PS: I could not figure out how to make a useful report using that
> bug report tool either.

You will need to register, and then use this page:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/enter_bug.cgi?product=D

Then select a component (usually DMD, druntime, or Phobos). D2 is
selected by default, all that's left is to write a summary and
description. You can also click on "Show Advanced Fields" (top left),
and in the Keywords field (way down) you can add things like
accepts-invalid, or rejects-valid. The list of keywords is here:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/describekeywords.cgi
November 13, 2012
Re: Compilable Recursive Data Structure ( was: Recursive data structure using template won't compile)
On 13/11/12 06:51, Rob T wrote:
> On Monday, 12 November 2012 at 14:28:53 UTC, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
>> On 11/12/12, Andrej Mitrovic <andrej.mitrovich@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On 11/12/12, Don Clugston <dac@nospam.com> wrote:
>>>> Yeah. Though note that 1000 bug reports are from bearophile.
>>>
>>> Actually only around 300 remain open:
>>> http://d.puremagic.com/issues/buglist.cgi?query_format=advanced&emailreporter2=1&emailtype2=substring&order=Importance&bug_status=UNCONFIRMED&bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=REOPENED&bug_status=VERIFIED&email2=bearophile
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Oh wait, that's only for DMD. It's 559 in total:
>> http://d.puremagic.com/issues/buglist.cgi?query_format=advanced&emailreporter2=1&emailtype2=substring&order=Importance&bug_status=UNCONFIRMED&bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=REOPENED&bug_status=VERIFIED&email2=bearophile
>>
>
> Issue 8990 and 6969, both related to this thread and unresolved, are not
> in the list, so I suspect there's a lot more missing too.
>
> PS: I could not figure out how to make a useful report using that bug
> report tool either.
>
> --rt

I recommend deskzilla lite. D is on its list of supported open-source 
projects. It maintains a local copy of the entire bugzilla database, so 
you're not restricted to the slow and horrible html interface.
November 13, 2012
Re: Compilable Recursive Data Structure ( was: Recursive data structure using template won't compile)
On 11/13/12, Don Clugston <dac@nospam.com> wrote:
> I recommend deskzilla lite. D is on its list of supported open-source
> projects. It maintains a local copy of the entire bugzilla database, so
> you're not restricted to the slow and horrible html interface.

Wow, I had no idea they had this. I've added a note about it here:
http://prowiki.org/wiki4d/wiki.cgi?D__Tutorial/BugReports Thanks!
November 13, 2012
Re: Compilable Recursive Data Structure ( was: Recursive data structure using template won't compile)
On Tue, 13 Nov 2012 11:56:57 +0100
Don Clugston <dac@nospam.com> wrote:
>
> I recommend deskzilla lite. D is on its list of supported open-source 
> projects. It maintains a local copy of the entire bugzilla database,
> so you're not restricted to the slow and horrible html interface.
> 

Awesome! I wish GitHub had something like that. (Hell, I wish every web
"app" had something like that.)

Although, $189 for anything with > 2k issues or anything non-OSS? Geez
that's expensive, what are they, Adobe?
November 13, 2012
Re: Compilable Recursive Data Structure ( was: Recursive data structure using template won't compile)
On Tue, 13 Nov 2012 11:19:36 -0500
Nick Sabalausky <SeeWebsiteToContactMe@semitwist.com> wrote:

> On Tue, 13 Nov 2012 11:56:57 +0100
> Don Clugston <dac@nospam.com> wrote:
> >
> > I recommend deskzilla lite. D is on its list of supported
> > open-source projects. It maintains a local copy of the entire
> > bugzilla database, so you're not restricted to the slow and
> > horrible html interface.
> > 
> 
> Awesome! I wish GitHub had something like that. (Hell, I wish every
> web "app" had something like that.)
> 
> Although, $189 for anything with > 2k issues or anything non-OSS? Geez
> that's expensive, what are they, Adobe?
> 

Oh, upon using it, it looks like the free version is for OSS projects
with any number of issues *and* non-OSS projects with <= 2k issues.
Guess I misread their download page.
Next ›   Last »
3 4 5 6 7
Top | Discussion index | About this forum | D home