July 10
On Sun, 09 Jul 2017 21:33:15 +0000, bachmeier wrote:

> The answer (assuming things are still run the way they
> were back then) is that you're not able to do anything about it. You
> won't see anything done with the official package and you won't be able
> to put anything in AUR because there is an official package.

I couldn't find a documented deprecation process, but they do deprecate packages; perhaps if that could be pushed forward it would allow someone to maintain something in AUR.
July 12
On Monday, 10 July 2017 at 23:39:36 UTC, rjframe wrote:
> I couldn't find a documented deprecation process, but they do deprecate packages; perhaps if that could be pushed forward it would allow someone to maintain something in AUR.

I can maintain the packages if they are moved to the AUR. I maintain most of the
dlang packages in there already. [1]

I been thinking of applying to become a TU, but haven't gotten around to do it. (I will probably do this in the future if needed)

[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/?K=dlang
Next ›   Last »
1 2 3