Ary Borenszweig wrote:
> Walter Bright escribió:
>> Oh, one more thing! I need a statement from you that you are releasing these files to the public domain.
> 
> I'm releasing those files to the public domain.

Thanks!

"BCS" <ao@pathlink.com> wrote in message news:78ccfa2d42b718cbc79c3bb7b06a@news.digitalmars.com...
> Reply to Ary,
>
>>>> But for that the only thing he need to do is to tell us URLs for the latests zip files to download.
>>>>
>>> Oh, it's one of the kind of installer I have no use for. Sorry missed that bit.
>>>
>> Why not?
>>
>
> I have no like for installers that don't contain (in the installer I download) the data they are supposed to install (I'll use them if there is no other way to install the program). I've already stated my reasons several times in this thread, but in short: I want an installer that has no dependencies (particularly no net dependencies) other than things like Windows (tm). I want to be able to archive it and know it will install the same version later, no matter what the rest of the world does. Most of the other uses being tossed about for an installer I would rather do via something else (like SVN).
>

Yea, this is why I'm convinced that, at least at some point, we'll want to have both kinds available, because there are a lot of people on both sides of that fence (I'm somewhere in between, fwiw).