August 24, 2013
Excuse my naive question. Why can't we have a 64bit version of the library ?
August 24, 2013
On Saturday, 24 August 2013 at 12:48:20 UTC, chmike wrote:
> Excuse my naive question. Why can't we have a 64bit version of the library ?

I suggest you read the thread “What's the status on Linux/amd64 ?” in this forum.

Cheers,

Olivier
August 24, 2013
On 2013-08-24 14:48, chmike wrote:
> Excuse my naive question. Why can't we have a 64bit version of the
> library ?

No reason, it just that someone need to make any necessary changes and make sure everything works. If the native types are used I don't think it will be any problems. The Java code uses int/long for pointers, they have a script converting between these.

-- 
/Jacob Carlborg
August 30, 2013
Sorry for the delay. I was busy.

Unfortunately adding -m32 doesn't help. The linker fails by spitting many references. This is probably unresolved references since I'm running a 64bit linux.

I can't spent more time investigating this. I hope a 64bit compatible version of the library will be made available some day.

I would be helpful to specify somewhere that the dwt library is only 32bit. If it was there I missed the information.
August 31, 2013
On 2013-08-30 13:59, chmike wrote:
> Sorry for the delay. I was busy.
>
> Unfortunately adding -m32 doesn't help. The linker fails by spitting
> many references. This is probably unresolved references since I'm
> running a 64bit linux.

Yes, you will get unresolved symbols. You need to install 32bit versions of the libraries that are needed.

-- 
/Jacob Carlborg
1 2
Next ›   Last »