December 17
On Sunday, 16 December 2018 at 00:17:55 UTC, Paul Backus wrote:
> There's something important you're glossing over here, which is that, in the general case, there's no single obvious or natural way to compose two DAGs together.
> For example: suppose project A's DAG has two "output" vertices (i.e., they have no outgoing edges), one corresponding to a "debug" build and one corresponding to a "release" build. Now suppose project B would like to depend on project A. For this to happen, our hypothetical DAG import function needs to add one or more edges that connect A's DAG to B's DAG. The question is, how many edges, and which vertices should these edges connect?

That doesn't seem right.

Surely you could write

    externalDependencies = [ someSubmodule.release ]

in your language-specific build tool, and have it convert to an equivalent import edge targeting the correct vertice in the standardized dependency graph?

It might be inconvenient in some cases (eg you have to manually tell your tool to import someSubmodule.release in release mode and someSubmodule.debug in debug mode), but it would still be infinitely more convenient and elegant than the current "multiple incompatible build tools per language, and shell/make scripts to link them together" paradigm.

Especially with the increasing usability of WebAsm, it would be nice to have a standard build model to link multiple modules in different languages together into a single wasm binary.

A standardized DAG model would also help making a project-wide equivalent to the Language Server Protocol. (I'm not convinced by BSP)
Next ›   Last »
1 2 3 4