Mir Algorithm http://mir-algorithm.dub.pm  - v2.0.0, new ndslice API, bitwise accelerated mir.algorithm.iteration, new mir.bitop module

Mir Optim http://mir-optim.dub.pm - v1.1.0, full rework of main LM loop, two times faster then Alglib for calibration of multiple curves.

Mir Random http://mir-random.dub.pm - v1.0.0, upgrade ndslice API

Mir http://mir.dub.pm - v2.0.0, upgrade ndslice API, `range` for n-dimensional random variables.

Asdf http://asdf.dub.pm - v0.2.5, null support for associative arrays (John Colvin)

Part of this work has been sponsored by Symmetry Investments and Kaleidic Associates.

http://symmetryinvestments.com
https://github.com/kaleidicassociates

Best,
Ilya Yaroshenko

On Sunday, 9 September 2018 at 17:24:49 UTC, 9il wrote:
> Mir Algorithm http://mir-algorithm.dub.pm  - v2.0.0, new ndslice API, bitwise accelerated mir.algorithm.iteration, new mir.bitop module
>
> Mir Optim http://mir-optim.dub.pm - v1.1.0, full rework of main LM loop, two times faster then Alglib for calibration of multiple curves.
>
> Mir Random http://mir-random.dub.pm - v1.0.0, upgrade ndslice API
>
> Mir http://mir.dub.pm - v2.0.0, upgrade ndslice API, `range` for n-dimensional random variables.
>
> Asdf http://asdf.dub.pm - v0.2.5, null support for associative arrays (John Colvin)
>
> Part of this work has been sponsored by Symmetry Investments and Kaleidic Associates.
>
> http://symmetryinvestments.com
> https://github.com/kaleidicassociates
>
> Best,
> Ilya Yaroshenko

great. numir (numpy like helper functions library) also supports mir-algorithm v2 today

https://github.com/libmir/numir/releases

On Monday, 10 September 2018 at 04:50:37 UTC, Shigeki Karita wrote:
> [snip]
>
> great. numir (numpy like helper functions library) also supports mir-algorithm v2 today
>
> https://github.com/libmir/numir/releases

Glad to hear it.

I hope the v2 API helps with explaining mir.

On Sunday, 9 September 2018 at 17:24:49 UTC, 9il wrote:
> Mir Algorithm http://mir-algorithm.dub.pm  - v2.0.0, new ndslice API,

Does new API mean that it's not backwards compatible? if so, where can we find the documentation for this new API?

Arredondo.

On Monday, 10 September 2018 at 12:55:01 UTC, Arredondo wrote:
> On Sunday, 9 September 2018 at 17:24:49 UTC, 9il wrote:
>> Mir Algorithm http://mir-algorithm.dub.pm  - v2.0.0, new ndslice API,
>
> Does new API mean that it's not backwards compatible? if so, where can we find the documentation for this new API?
>
> Arredondo.

http://docs.algorithm.dlang.io - docs for recent Mir Algorithm release.
The main difference is that Slice definition is changed to

struct mir_slice(Iterator_, size_t N_ = 1, SliceKind kind_ = Contiguous)

alias Slice = mir_slice;

The parameters order was reversed, last two params are optional now.

For example, see the PR for ndslice API update for old main Mir repo.
https://github.com/libmir/mir/pull/397/files#diff-399a70373923e55f87a86928eb3cc731L43

Similar situation with Series definition.

On Monday, 10 September 2018 at 14:33:11 UTC, 9il wrote:
> On Monday, 10 September 2018 at 12:55:01 UTC, Arredondo wrote:
>> On Sunday, 9 September 2018 at 17:24:49 UTC, 9il wrote:
>>> Mir Algorithm http://mir-algorithm.dub.pm  - v2.0.0, new ndslice API,
>>
>> Does new API mean that it's not backwards compatible? if so, where can we find the documentation for this new API?
>>
>> Arredondo.
>
> http://docs.algorithm.dlang.io - docs for recent Mir Algorithm release.
> The main difference is that Slice definition is changed to
>
> struct mir_slice(Iterator_, size_t N_ = 1, SliceKind kind_ = Contiguous)
>
> alias Slice = mir_slice;
>
> The parameters order was reversed, last two params are optional now.
>
> For example, see the PR for ndslice API update for old main Mir repo.
> https://github.com/libmir/mir/pull/397/files#diff-399a70373923e55f87a86928eb3cc731L43
>
> Similar situation with Series definition.

mir-algorithm and lubeck do not interact well right now on run.dlang.org as lubeck depends on the earlier API. The maintainer of that might consider adding an older version of mir-algorithm until the situation is resolved.

On Monday, 10 September 2018 at 17:42:16 UTC, jmh530 wrote:
> [snip]
>
> mir-algorithm and lubeck do not interact well right now on run.dlang.org as lubeck depends on the earlier API. The maintainer of that might consider adding an older version of mir-algorithm until the situation is resolved.

Hmm, it looks like all you have to do just change the dependency to whatever works with lubeck and it works fine. Maybe it can be temporarily adjusted so that adding lubeck as a dependency adds the correct version of mir algorithm by default?

On Monday, 10 September 2018 at 20:22:08 UTC, jmh530 wrote:
> On Monday, 10 September 2018 at 17:42:16 UTC, jmh530 wrote:
>> [snip]
>>
>> mir-algorithm and lubeck do not interact well right now on run.dlang.org as lubeck depends on the earlier API. The maintainer of that might consider adding an older version of mir-algorithm until the situation is resolved.
>
> Hmm, it looks like all you have to do just change the dependency to whatever works with lubeck and it works fine. Maybe it can be temporarily adjusted so that adding lubeck as a dependency adds the correct version of mir algorithm by default?

Thanks for the report.

Lubeck has been tagged to release.
Plus tour update https://github.com/dlang-tour/english/pull/269 (requires mir v2.0.2)