October 04
Upon reading this, It triggered an idea.

On Saturday, 30 September 2017 at 16:10:44 UTC, Jonathan Marler wrote:
> https://wiki.dlang.org/DIP88
>
> I'd like to see DIP88 (Named Parameters) revived.  Was this proposal rejected or is it just stale and needs a refresh?  Named parameters can be implemented in a library, however, in my opinion they are useful enough to warrant a clean syntax with language support.  I'd be willing to refresh the DIP so long as I know the idea has not already been rejected.

Upon reading the DIP, it reminds me of object destruction.

// extracts success & message from returned type. Could be tuple or structure, etc. May even eliminate use of tuples for multiple return

auto {success, message} = callVoldermortFunction();

This is concept is used in Kotlin. JavaScript es6 takes it even further (function parameters and arguments support object destruction)
October 04
On Wednesday, 4 October 2017 at 09:52:39 UTC, aberba wrote:
> Upon reading this, It triggered an idea.
>
> On Saturday, 30 September 2017 at 16:10:44 UTC, Jonathan Marler wrote:
>> [...]
>
> Upon reading the DIP, it reminds me of object destruction.
>
> // extracts success & message from returned type. Could be tuple or structure, etc. May even eliminate use of tuples for multiple return
>
> auto {success, message} = callVoldermortFunction();
>
> This is concept is used in Kotlin. JavaScript es6 takes it even further (function parameters and arguments support object destruction)

Oops. Wrong place. Will repost in general.