June 01, 2001 Re: Windows response time and advices: More infos | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
> I avoid Windows for real-time applications if at all possible, but my main reason is uptime of the OS :> sorry, i don't understand "uptime of the OS :>" you avoid Windows for real-time applications: did you already made some ? > Does the PC control the stepper moters of the CNC machine directly or is there a controller in the CNC already? or do you have an ISA/PCI card sitting in the PC? not only stepper motor, cc motor as well. the cnc is a software cnc. there is an external board based on a CPLD, plugged on the ECP Parallel port. It provides only low level services: io, wired security, some wired logic and power management. > (not taking into acount development cost of the board and associated software). that is the problem, i wonder if it is cheaper than making a Windows device driver. the big if is: can a device driver do the job ? And a PC Motherboard is quite a powerfull and cheap board.. > Yes. However you may find adding an external controller is cheaper then trying to get your windows program to run fast enough. that is the question. I just know some windows program/device driver use to make software MPEG or MP3 decompression. that is real time and quite fast isn't it ? In fact, i know there is special PC cnc board: see www.galilmc.com, ni.com and other. But we have some 'virtual cnc' classes i hesitate to trow away. I'm just exploring all the possibilities. I try to evaluate what Windows can do before taking a decision. Thanks and Regards Roland |
Copyright © 1999-2021 by the D Language Foundation