I saw the bug report: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1626296&group_id=154306&atid=791252

Is this resolved yet?  Does gdc-0.22 support amd64 (linux) yet?

Neal Becker wrote:

> Is this resolved yet?  Does gdc-0.22 support amd64 (linux) yet?

Does D-the-language even support 64-bit yet ? (I think it doesn't)

Think David said that 64-bit support would be a "GDC 1.0" feature:
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/archives/D/gnu/GDC_release_0.21_2314.html

--anders

Neal Becker wrote:
> I saw the bug report:
> http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1626296&group_id=154306&atid=791252
> 
> Is this resolved yet?  Does gdc-0.22 support amd64 (linux) yet?

It does not yet support it.

I was working on a port, but all evidence suggests that David is working furiously on porting it himself.

 - Gregor Richards

Neal Becker wrote:
> I saw the bug report:
> http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1626296&group_id=154306&atid=791252
> 
> Is this resolved yet?  Does gdc-0.22 support amd64 (linux) yet?

64-bit support is almost ready.  The compiler works, but I am dealing with all sorts of build problems.

Anders F Björklund wrote:
> Neal Becker wrote:
> 
>> Is this resolved yet?  Does gdc-0.22 support amd64 (linux) yet?
> 
> 
> Does D-the-language even support 64-bit yet ? (I think it doesn't)
> 
> Think David said that 64-bit support would be a "GDC 1.0" feature:
> http://www.digitalmars.com/d/archives/D/gnu/GDC_release_0.21_2314.html
> 
> --anders

1.0 requires 64-bit support, but 64-bit does not require 1.0 ;-)

David Friedman wrote:
> 64-bit support is almost ready.  The compiler works, but I am dealing with all sorts of build problems.

That's good news. Well, the first part anyway ;).