_moduleCtor() has disappeared from druntime

Please put it back. Windows DLL support is now broken because it's gone.

On Dec 29, 2011, at 2:03 AM, Walter Bright wrote:

> Please put it back. Windows DLL support is now broken because it's gone.

I'm ostensibly back at work today.  I'll give this a look.

On 1/3/2012 10:50 AM, Sean Kelly wrote:
> On Dec 29, 2011, at 2:03 AM, Walter Bright wrote:
>
>> Please put it back. Windows DLL support is now broken because it's gone.
> I'm ostensibly back at work today.  I'll give this a look. _______________________________________________
>

That's fixed, but now __moduleDtor is undefined.

On Sun, 08 Jan 2012 02:10:56 +0100, Walter Bright <walter at digitalmars.com> wrote:

>
>
> On 1/3/2012 10:50 AM, Sean Kelly wrote:
>> On Dec 29, 2011, at 2:03 AM, Walter Bright wrote:
>>
>>> Please put it back. Windows DLL support is now broken because it's gone.
>> I'm ostensibly back at work today.  I'll give this a look. _______________________________________________
>>
>
> That's fixed, but now __moduleDtor is undefined.
> _______________________________________________
> D-runtime mailing list
> D-runtime at puremagic.com
> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/d-runtime

It's really a bug of any code to rely on internal function names. There is core.runtime.Runtime.initialize().

Which dlls are referring to these functions?

On 1/8/2012 8:45 AM, Martin Nowak wrote:
> On Sun, 08 Jan 2012 02:10:56 +0100, Walter Bright <walter at digitalmars.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 1/3/2012 10:50 AM, Sean Kelly wrote:
>>> On Dec 29, 2011, at 2:03 AM, Walter Bright wrote:
>>>
>>>> Please put it back. Windows DLL support is now broken because it's gone.
>>> I'm ostensibly back at work today.  I'll give this a look. _______________________________________________
>>>
>>
>> That's fixed, but now __moduleDtor is undefined. _______________________________________________
> It's really a bug of any code to rely on internal function names. There is core.runtime.Runtime.initialize().
>
> Which dlls are referring to these functions?
>

The sample code. Those functions are the original design for the DLL support; whether they are good or bad is less relevant than the arbitrary breakage of existing code.

On 12/29/2011 2:03 AM, Walter Bright wrote:
> Please put it back. Windows DLL support is now broken because it's gone.
>

Now it's _moduleTlsCtor() and _moduleTlsDtor() that are missing.

Forums