As we resume our regularly scheduled breakage of DLLs on Win32 with druntime changes.

..\dmd testmydll -version=DYNAMIC_LOAD

testmydll
Start Dynamic Link...
DLL_PROCESS_ATTACH
static this for mydll
object.Error: assert(0) or HLT instruction
_______________________________________________
D-runtime mailing list
D-runtime@puremagic.com
http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/d-runtime

The bad commit happened sometime since March 14.

Brad, can we somehow get the DLL tests into the test suite? I'm apparently the only one who runs them.

On 3/21/2012 1:23 AM, Walter Bright wrote:
> As we resume our regularly scheduled breakage of DLLs on Win32 with druntime changes.
>
> ..\dmd testmydll -version=DYNAMIC_LOAD
>
> testmydll
> Start Dynamic Link...
> DLL_PROCESS_ATTACH
> static this for mydll
> object.Error: assert(0) or HLT instruction
>
_______________________________________________
D-runtime mailing list
D-runtime@puremagic.com
http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/d-runtime

There should be nothing that prevents anyone from adding tests to the suite.  You don't need me to do it.  I don't do windows code if I can avoid it.

On 3/21/2012 1:38 AM, Walter Bright wrote:
> The bad commit happened sometime since March 14.
> 
> Brad, can we somehow get the DLL tests into the test suite? I'm apparently the only one who runs them.
> 
> On 3/21/2012 1:23 AM, Walter Bright wrote:
>> As we resume our regularly scheduled breakage of DLLs on Win32 with druntime changes.
>>
>> ..\dmd testmydll -version=DYNAMIC_LOAD
>>
>> testmydll
>> Start Dynamic Link...
>> DLL_PROCESS_ATTACH
>> static this for mydll
>> object.Error: assert(0) or HLT instruction
>>
> _______________________________________________
> D-runtime mailing list
> D-runtime@puremagic.com
> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/d-runtime

_______________________________________________
D-runtime mailing list
D-runtime@puremagic.com
http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/d-runtime

I was hoping to delegate!

On 3/21/2012 2:19 AM, Brad Roberts wrote:
> There should be nothing that prevents anyone from adding tests to the suite.  You don't need me to do it.  I don't do
> windows code if I can avoid it.
>
_______________________________________________
D-runtime mailing list
D-runtime@puremagic.com
http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/d-runtime

Delegate away, but to someone who actually develops on windows.

On 3/21/2012 2:53 AM, Walter Bright wrote:
> I was hoping to delegate!
> 
> On 3/21/2012 2:19 AM, Brad Roberts wrote:
>> There should be nothing that prevents anyone from adding tests to the suite.  You don't need me to do it.  I don't do windows code if I can avoid it.
>>
> _______________________________________________
> D-runtime mailing list
> D-runtime@puremagic.com
> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/d-runtime

_______________________________________________
D-runtime mailing list
D-runtime@puremagic.com
http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/d-runtime

Zitat von Walter Bright <walter@digitalmars.com>:

> As we resume our regularly scheduled breakage of DLLs on Win32 with druntime changes.
>
> ..\dmd testmydll -version=DYNAMIC_LOAD
>
> testmydll
> Start Dynamic Link...
> DLL_PROCESS_ATTACH
> static this for mydll
> object.Error: assert(0) or HLT instruction
> _______________________________________________
> D-runtime mailing list
> D-runtime@puremagic.com
> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/d-runtime

You're apparently not referring to this HTML-unittest
http://dlang.org/dll.html#Dcode. None of it compiles,
but once it is made compiling it works.

Start Dynamic Link...
DLL_PROCESS_ATTACH
static this for mydll
Hello world!
DLL_PROCESS_DETACH
static ~this for mydll

Please post a correct way to setup a Windows dmd-dev toolchain, how to run unittest... .

test.d imports mydll.d and needs mydll's ModuleInfo, thus dynamic loading
is not possible. Have you linked the module twice?

_______________________________________________
D-runtime mailing list
D-runtime@puremagic.com
http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/d-runtime

The way to compile it doesn't fit into the test harness you created.

On 3/21/2012 3:26 AM, Brad Roberts wrote:
> Delegate away, but to someone who actually develops on windows.
>
> On 3/21/2012 2:53 AM, Walter Bright wrote:
>> I was hoping to delegate!
>>
>> On 3/21/2012 2:19 AM, Brad Roberts wrote:
>>> There should be nothing that prevents anyone from adding tests to the suite.  You don't need me to do it.  I don't do
>>> windows code if I can avoid it.
>>>
>>
_______________________________________________
D-runtime mailing list
D-runtime@puremagic.com
http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/d-runtime

On 3/21/2012 5:23 AM, dawg@dawgfoto.de wrote:
>
>
> You're apparently not referring to this HTML-unittest
> http://dlang.org/dll.html#Dcode. None of it compiles,
> but once it is made compiling it works.
>
> Start Dynamic Link...
> DLL_PROCESS_ATTACH
> static this for mydll
> Hello world!
> DLL_PROCESS_DETACH
> static ~this for mydll
>
> Please post a correct way to setup a Windows dmd-dev toolchain, how to run unittest... .
>
> test.d imports mydll.d and needs mydll's ModuleInfo, thus dynamic loading
> is not possible. Have you linked the module twice?
>

I'm running the same test suite for years for DLLs. No, it is not linking things twice. Historically, it breaks badly every time someone tweaks the druntime startup code.
_______________________________________________
D-runtime mailing list
D-runtime@puremagic.com
http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/d-runtime

You can run arbitrary .sh files, so anything can be scripted.

On 3/21/2012 10:08 AM, Walter Bright wrote:
> The way to compile it doesn't fit into the test harness you created.
> 
> On 3/21/2012 3:26 AM, Brad Roberts wrote:
>> Delegate away, but to someone who actually develops on windows.
>>
>> On 3/21/2012 2:53 AM, Walter Bright wrote:
>>> I was hoping to delegate!
>>>
>>> On 3/21/2012 2:19 AM, Brad Roberts wrote:
>>>> There should be nothing that prevents anyone from adding tests to the suite.  You don't need me to do it.  I don't do windows code if I can avoid it.
>>>>
>>>
> _______________________________________________
> D-runtime mailing list
> D-runtime@puremagic.com
> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/d-runtime

_______________________________________________
D-runtime mailing list
D-runtime@puremagic.com
http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/d-runtime

Nobody liked my .sh version of the win32 tests :-)

On 3/21/2012 10:18 AM, Brad Roberts wrote:
> You can run arbitrary .sh files, so anything can be scripted.
>
> On 3/21/2012 10:08 AM, Walter Bright wrote:
>> The way to compile it doesn't fit into the test harness you created.
>>
>> On 3/21/2012 3:26 AM, Brad Roberts wrote:
>>> Delegate away, but to someone who actually develops on windows.
>>>
>>> On 3/21/2012 2:53 AM, Walter Bright wrote:
>>>> I was hoping to delegate!
>>>>
>>>> On 3/21/2012 2:19 AM, Brad Roberts wrote:
>>>>> There should be nothing that prevents anyone from adding tests to the suite.  You don't need me to do it.  I don't do
>>>>> windows code if I can avoid it.
>>>>>
>>>>
_______________________________________________
D-runtime mailing list
D-runtime@puremagic.com
http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/d-runtime