Thread overview | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
January 28, 2013 [dmd-internals] open regression pull requests | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
There's a couple open bugs with pull requests that are in the regression and blocker severity levels. It'd be good to get those dealt with: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/buglist.cgi?keywords=pull&query_format=advanced&keywords_type=allwords&bug_severity=regression&bug_severity=blocker&bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=REOPENED&columnlist=bug_severity%2Ccomponent%2Cversion%2Cshort_desc%2Ckeywords&product=D&query_format=advanced&order=bug_severity%2Cbug_id&query_based_on= We're pretty much at the point where I think it's time to consider cutting a new release. We're in the neighborhood of 100 bugs fixed and it's been a month since the last release. So, consider what's on your critical fix list and start taking a look at the rest of the open regressions (there's currently 14) and let's get some polishing done. Yes, I know there's some fun heated discussions lately, but I don't believe any of them are so critical that they're on the "must be done before the next release" list. Getting regression fixes in the hands of users is much higher, imho. Later, Brad _______________________________________________ dmd-internals mailing list dmd-internals@puremagic.com http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-internals |
January 28, 2013 Re: [phobos] open regression pull requests | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Brad Roberts | On 28 January 2013 15:58, Brad Roberts <braddr@puremagic.com> wrote: > There's a couple open bugs with pull requests that are in the regression and blocker severity levels. It'd be good to get those dealt with: > > http://d.puremagic.com/issues/buglist.cgi?keywords=pull&query_format=advanced&keywords_type=allwords&bug_severity=regression&bug_severity=blocker&bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=REOPENED&columnlist=bug_severity%2Ccomponent%2Cversion%2Cshort_desc%2Ckeywords&product=D&query_format=advanced&order=bug_severity%2Cbug_id&query_based_on= > > We're pretty much at the point where I think it's time to consider cutting a new release. We're in the neighborhood of 100 bugs fixed and it's been a month since the last release. So, consider what's on your critical fix list and start taking a look at the rest of the open regressions (there's currently 14) and let's get some polishing done. > > Yes, I know there's some fun heated discussions lately, but I don't believe any of them are so critical that they're on the "must be done before the next release" list. Getting regression fixes in the hands of users is much higher, imho. I agree. There's just one other optimizer bug worth mentioning: 6962, "Wrong Code With Scope Exit and Array Parameter, only with -O" _______________________________________________ phobos mailing list phobos@puremagic.com http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos |
January 28, 2013 Re: [phobos] open regression pull requests | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Don Clugston | I also agree with putting priority on regressions at this point. On 1/28/2013 7:29 AM, Don Clugston wrote: > On 28 January 2013 15:58, Brad Roberts <braddr@puremagic.com> wrote: >> There's a couple open bugs with pull requests that are in the regression and blocker severity levels. It'd be good to >> get those dealt with: >> >> http://d.puremagic.com/issues/buglist.cgi?keywords=pull&query_format=advanced&keywords_type=allwords&bug_severity=regression&bug_severity=blocker&bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=REOPENED&columnlist=bug_severity%2Ccomponent%2Cversion%2Cshort_desc%2Ckeywords&product=D&query_format=advanced&order=bug_severity%2Cbug_id&query_based_on= >> >> We're pretty much at the point where I think it's time to consider cutting a new release. We're in the neighborhood of >> 100 bugs fixed and it's been a month since the last release. So, consider what's on your critical fix list and start >> taking a look at the rest of the open regressions (there's currently 14) and let's get some polishing done. >> >> Yes, I know there's some fun heated discussions lately, but I don't believe any of them are so critical that they're on >> the "must be done before the next release" list. Getting regression fixes in the hands of users is much higher, imho. > I agree. There's just one other optimizer bug worth mentioning: > 6962, "Wrong Code With Scope Exit and Array Parameter, only with -O" > _______________________________________________ > phobos mailing list > phobos@puremagic.com > http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos > > _______________________________________________ phobos mailing list phobos@puremagic.com http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos |
Copyright © 1999-2021 by the D Language Foundation