Anything yet to be pulled or cherry-picked into the 2.063 branch?
_______________________________________________
dmd-beta mailing list
dmd-beta@puremagic.com
http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta

I pushed bug10299 fix to 2.063 branch.

https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/commit/9069185a81e24a72699a5584632ca85b520319b1

AFAIK, in druntime and Phobos have no regression fixes that are not yet cherry-picked in 2.063 branch.

Kenji Hara


2013/6/9 Walter Bright <walter@digitalmars.com>

> Anything yet to be pulled or cherry-picked into the 2.063 branch?
> ______________________________**_________________
> dmd-beta mailing list
> dmd-beta@puremagic.com
> http://lists.puremagic.com/**mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta<http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta>
>

Well, there's still 4 open regressions.  Assuming they apply to the 2.063 branch, they ought to be addressed.

On 6/8/13 8:23 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
> Anything yet to be pulled or cherry-picked into the 2.063 branch?
> _______________________________________________
> dmd-beta mailing list
> dmd-beta@puremagic.com
> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta

_______________________________________________
dmd-beta mailing list
dmd-beta@puremagic.com
http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta

2013/6/9 Brad Roberts <braddr@puremagic.com>

> Well, there's still 4 open regressions.  Assuming they apply to the 2.063 branch, they ought to be addressed.


I closed one already-fixed issue. http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10299

Create a pull request for one. http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10268 https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/pull/1340

And, bug10215 is not a true compiler regression. It exists just only in the
released package.
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10215#c9

Then, I have no opinion about bug10255... http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10255

Kenji Hara

On 6/9/13, Brad Roberts <braddr@puremagic.com> wrote:
> Well, there's still 4 open regressions.  Assuming they apply to the 2.063
> branch, they ought to be
> addressed.

Here's a new 2.063 regression:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10317
_______________________________________________
dmd-beta mailing list
dmd-beta@puremagic.com
http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta

On 6/8/2013 11:32 PM, Kenji Hara wrote:
>
> Then, I have no opinion about bug10255...
> http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10255
>

Although I want to eventually get it fixed, it's not causing any problems.
_______________________________________________
dmd-beta mailing list
dmd-beta@puremagic.com
http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta