Thread overview | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
November 23, 2001 templates | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Back in January I was trying to compile my code with DC++ 8.0B2, but finally gave up because "Basically, you've run into the fact that DMC++ does not have the templates implemented as proposed in the latest standards." (Jan Knepper) Has this issue been addressed yet? Ed Sowell |
November 23, 2001 Re: templates | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Edward F. Sowell | There have been many improvements in template support in the 8.2x series, but they aren't perfect yet. -Walter "Edward F. Sowell" <sowelled@home.com> wrote in message news:3BFE7AD8.44E23681@home.com... > Back in January I was trying to compile my code with DC++ 8.0B2, but finally gave up because > > "Basically, you've run into the fact that DMC++ does not have the > templates > implemented as proposed in the latest standards." (Jan Knepper) > > Has this issue been addressed yet? > > Ed Sowell > |
January 21, 2002 Re: templates | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Walter | Would I be correct in my belief that "template member functions" are part of the "not perfect yet" category? This is the most precise term I have been able to find for templatized functions as members of a class (which may or may not be a template itself). 'vector' has a constructor that is templatized to take a interator class, as well as several other templatized members.
Just curious, 'coz it's keeping me from testing DMC on my current project.
(And yes, I do understand that templates are amazingly hairy things
and that the developer list for DMC is pretty short...)
Mac
On Fri, 23 Nov 2001 10:29:59 -0800, "Walter" <walter@digitalmars.com> wrote:
>There have been many improvements in template support in the 8.2x series, but they aren't perfect yet. -Walter
>
>
>"Edward F. Sowell" <sowelled@home.com> wrote in message news:3BFE7AD8.44E23681@home.com...
>> Back in January I was trying to compile my code with DC++ 8.0B2, but finally gave up because
>>
>> "Basically, you've run into the fact that DMC++ does not have the
>> templates
>> implemented as proposed in the latest standards." (Jan Knepper)
>>
>> Has this issue been addressed yet?
>>
>> Ed Sowell
>>
>
>
|
January 22, 2002 Re: templates | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Mac Reiter | Yes, you'd be correct! I will get them implemented, though. -Walter "Mac Reiter" <reiter@nomadics.com> wrote in message news:3c4c6e33.336720909@news.digitalmars.com... > Would I be correct in my belief that "template member functions" are part of the "not perfect yet" category? This is the most precise term I have been able to find for templatized functions as members of a class (which may or may not be a template itself). 'vector' has a constructor that is templatized to take a interator class, as well as several other templatized members. > > Just curious, 'coz it's keeping me from testing DMC on my current project. > > (And yes, I do understand that templates are amazingly hairy things > and that the developer list for DMC is pretty short...) > Mac > > On Fri, 23 Nov 2001 10:29:59 -0800, "Walter" <walter@digitalmars.com> wrote: > > >There have been many improvements in template support in the 8.2x series, but they aren't perfect yet. -Walter > > > > > >"Edward F. Sowell" <sowelled@home.com> wrote in message news:3BFE7AD8.44E23681@home.com... > >> Back in January I was trying to compile my code with DC++ 8.0B2, but finally gave up because > >> > >> "Basically, you've run into the fact that DMC++ does not have the > >> templates > >> implemented as proposed in the latest standards." (Jan Knepper) > >> > >> Has this issue been addressed yet? > >> > >> Ed Sowell > >> > > > > > |
Copyright © 1999-2021 by the D Language Foundation