Ok, I've got .17 beta up now which uses a shorter name mangling scheme. Should help. -Walter

"Christof Meerwald" <cmeerw@web.de> wrote in message news:ahpqeg$gn0$1@digitaldaemon.com...
> On Thu, 25 Jul 2002 13:50:09 -0700, Walter wrote:
> > How far over does it go? The latest beta will say.
>
> here are two examples:
>
> std::list<std::pair<std::pair<std::string, char>, int> > a;
>
> decorated identifier '...' is 64 longer than maximum of 900
>
> decorated identifier '...' is 37 longer than maximum of 900 (with
> _STLP_USE_ABBREVS defined)
>
>
> std::list<std::pair<std::pair<std::string,
>   std::basic_string<unsigned char> >, int> > b;
>
> Error: decorated identifier '...' is 584 longer than maximum of 900
>
> Error: decorated identifier '...' is 557 longer than maximum of 900 (with
> _STLP_USE_ABBREVS defined)
>
>
> Using _STLP_USE_ABBREVS doesn't seem to make much difference, but strings seem to really generate long symbols.
>
>
> BTW, I have briefly looked at some OMF documentation but haven't found a reason for this 1024-byte limitation (the record size field is 16 bits),
but
> maybe I have missed something...
>
>
> bye, Christof
>
> --
> http://cmeerw.org                                 JID: cmeerw@jabber.at mailto cmeerw at web.de
>
> ...and what have you contributed to the Net?