Walter

I got the following when compiling my version of the whereis program for DMC++. Is this something immediately obvious, or would you now like me to try and distill it down?


sc
..\whereis.cpp -mn -WA -3 -a8 -c -D_CONSOLE=1 -I..\..\..\..\include\stlsoft
-o..\whereis.obj
Error: System Error (Access Violation at 001B:01D95977)
Lines Processed: 147875  Errors: 0  Warnings: 0
Build failed


Matthew

I need a small reproducible sample.

"Matthew Wilson" <dmd@synesis.com.au> wrote in message news:arunpb$1jn8$1@digitaldaemon.com...
> Walter
>
> I got the following when compiling my version of the whereis program for DMC++. Is this something immediately obvious, or would you now like me to try and distill it down?
>
>
> sc
>
..\whereis.cpp -mn -WA -3 -a8 -c -D_CONSOLE=1 -I..\..\..\..\include\stlsoft
> -o..\whereis.obj
> Error: System Error (Access Violation at 001B:01D95977)
> Lines Processed: 147875  Errors: 0  Warnings: 0
> Build failed
>
>
> Matthew
>
>

I'll do my best. The code is a little involved ...

:)

"Walter" <walter@digitalmars.com> wrote in message news:as06f5$8ok$1@digitaldaemon.com...
> I need a small reproducible sample.
>
> "Matthew Wilson" <dmd@synesis.com.au> wrote in message news:arunpb$1jn8$1@digitaldaemon.com...
> > Walter
> >
> > I got the following when compiling my version of the whereis program for DMC++. Is this something immediately obvious, or would you now like me
to
> > try and distill it down?
> >
> >
> > sc
> >
>
..\whereis.cpp -mn -WA -3 -a8 -c -D_CONSOLE=1 -I..\..\..\..\include\stlsoft
> > -o..\whereis.obj
> > Error: System Error (Access Violation at 001B:01D95977)
> > Lines Processed: 147875  Errors: 0  Warnings: 0
> > Build failed
> >
> >
> > Matthew
> >
> >
>
>

I suspect so :-(
My experience with that is that nearly always it can be reduced to 20 lines
or less.

"Matthew Wilson" <dmd@synesis.com.au> wrote in message news:as0k13$nh8$1@digitaldaemon.com...
> I'll do my best. The code is a little involved ...
>
> :)
>
> "Walter" <walter@digitalmars.com> wrote in message news:as06f5$8ok$1@digitaldaemon.com...
> > I need a small reproducible sample.
> >
> > "Matthew Wilson" <dmd@synesis.com.au> wrote in message news:arunpb$1jn8$1@digitaldaemon.com...
> > > Walter
> > >
> > > I got the following when compiling my version of the whereis program
for
> > > DMC++. Is this something immediately obvious, or would you now like me
> to
> > > try and distill it down?
> > >
> > >
> > > sc
> > >
> >
>
..\whereis.cpp -mn -WA -3 -a8 -c -D_CONSOLE=1 -I..\..\..\..\include\stlsoft
> > > -o..\whereis.obj
> > > Error: System Error (Access Violation at 001B:01D95977)
> > > Lines Processed: 147875  Errors: 0  Warnings: 0
> > > Build failed
> > >
> > >
> > > Matthew
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>

It's a NULL access, at 0x00429E03 (scppn.exe, version 8.30).

Am working on a minimal precipitating code set now


"Walter" <walter@digitalmars.com> wrote in message news:as0qgo$ud7$2@digitaldaemon.com...
> I suspect so :-(
> My experience with that is that nearly always it can be reduced to 20
lines
> or less.
>
> "Matthew Wilson" <dmd@synesis.com.au> wrote in message news:as0k13$nh8$1@digitaldaemon.com...
> > I'll do my best. The code is a little involved ...
> >
> > :)
> >
> > "Walter" <walter@digitalmars.com> wrote in message news:as06f5$8ok$1@digitaldaemon.com...
> > > I need a small reproducible sample.
> > >
> > > "Matthew Wilson" <dmd@synesis.com.au> wrote in message news:arunpb$1jn8$1@digitaldaemon.com...
> > > > Walter
> > > >
> > > > I got the following when compiling my version of the whereis program
> for
> > > > DMC++. Is this something immediately obvious, or would you now like
me
> > to
> > > > try and distill it down?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > sc
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
..\whereis.cpp -mn -WA -3 -a8 -c -D_CONSOLE=1 -I..\..\..\..\include\stlsoft
> > > > -o..\whereis.obj
> > > > Error: System Error (Access Violation at 001B:01D95977)
> > > > Lines Processed: 147875  Errors: 0  Warnings: 0
> > > > Build failed
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Matthew
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>

Esteemed compiler Walter, you are indeed correct.

I have managed to distill it down enormously. The attached code causes a crash in scppn.exe : access violation reading from 0x0000000. Instruction is at 0x00429E03 in 8.30, and at 0x00429F7B in 8.31.

Hope this can be fixed easily and speedily, as I reckon I'll get all that code we talked about to you toute suite if so.

Thanks

Matthew

"Walter" <walter@digitalmars.com> wrote in message news:as0qgo$ud7$2@digitaldaemon.com...
> I suspect so :-(
> My experience with that is that nearly always it can be reduced to 20
lines
> or less.
>
> "Matthew Wilson" <dmd@synesis.com.au> wrote in message news:as0k13$nh8$1@digitaldaemon.com...
> > I'll do my best. The code is a little involved ...
> >
> > :)
> >
> > "Walter" <walter@digitalmars.com> wrote in message news:as06f5$8ok$1@digitaldaemon.com...
> > > I need a small reproducible sample.
> > >
> > > "Matthew Wilson" <dmd@synesis.com.au> wrote in message news:arunpb$1jn8$1@digitaldaemon.com...
> > > > Walter
> > > >
> > > > I got the following when compiling my version of the whereis program
> for
> > > > DMC++. Is this something immediately obvious, or would you now like
me
> > to
> > > > try and distill it down?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > sc
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
..\whereis.cpp -mn -WA -3 -a8 -c -D_CONSOLE=1 -I..\..\..\..\include\stlsoft
> > > > -o..\whereis.obj
> > > > Error: System Error (Access Violation at 001B:01D95977)
> > > > Lines Processed: 147875  Errors: 0  Warnings: 0
> > > > Build failed
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Matthew
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>

Ok, I'll have a look now <g>. -Walter

"Matthew Wilson" <dmd@synesis.com.au> wrote in message news:as20t1$27bp$1@digitaldaemon.com...
> Esteemed compiler Walter, you are indeed correct.
>
> I have managed to distill it down enormously. The attached code causes a crash in scppn.exe : access violation reading from 0x0000000. Instruction
is
> at 0x00429E03 in 8.30, and at 0x00429F7B in 8.31.
>
> Hope this can be fixed easily and speedily, as I reckon I'll get all that code we talked about to you toute suite if so.
>
> Thanks
>
> Matthew