Thread overview |
---|
December 26, 2002 Re: Complex numbers for DOSX | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Hi Walter, Is it difficult to enable complex number stuff (per C99) in DOSX model either? The only problem you mentioned in CTG is the fact that under DOSX coprocessor may not present. What about enabling complex number feature for DOSX for CPU target 5 (Pentium) and above? Since P5 all processors have FPU integrated. And if not, this is problem of developer to provide system-level support for coprocessor. What do you think? Looking forward for your answer, Nic Tiger. P.S. By the way, using complex numbers with simplicity you provided is great! |
December 28, 2002 Re: Complex numbers for DOSX | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Nic Tiger | That means two runtime libraries would have to be supplied. It's doable, but just a lot of work. "Nic Tiger" <nictiger@progtech.ru> wrote in message news:aueig0$26ev$1@digitaldaemon.com... > Hi Walter, > > Is it difficult to enable complex number stuff (per C99) in DOSX model > either? > > The only problem you mentioned in CTG is the fact that under DOSX coprocessor may not present. > > What about enabling complex number feature for DOSX for CPU target 5 (Pentium) and above? Since P5 all processors have FPU integrated. And if not, this is problem of developer to provide system-level support for coprocessor. > > What do you think? > > Looking forward for your answer, > Nic Tiger. > > P.S. By the way, using complex numbers with simplicity you provided is great! > > |
December 29, 2002 Re: Complex numbers for DOSX | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Walter | Do you mean 2 libraries DOSX and WIN32 or you mean DOSX 5+ and 3+ ? I think complex number stuff can be separated in different lib ( complex.lib, e.g.) and the only support is needed is from compiler to compile with -mx -5 (+) using complex. The rest of the standard library will stay unmodified. Am I right? Or something prevents using this way? Nic Tiger. P.S. I have DMC CD with all RTL sources and can help you in porting complex number stuff from WIN32 library to DOSX library. "Walter" <walter@digitalmars.com> ÓÏÏÂÝÉÌ/ÓÏÏÂÝÉÌÁ × ÎÏ×ÏÓÔÑÈ ÓÌÅÄÕÀÝÅÅ: news:auj9as$2ik6$2@digitaldaemon.com... > That means two runtime libraries would have to be supplied. It's doable, but > just a lot of work. > > "Nic Tiger" <nictiger@progtech.ru> wrote in message news:aueig0$26ev$1@digitaldaemon.com... > > Hi Walter, > > > > Is it difficult to enable complex number stuff (per C99) in DOSX model > > either? > > > > The only problem you mentioned in CTG is the fact that under DOSX coprocessor may not present. > > > > What about enabling complex number feature for DOSX for CPU target 5 (Pentium) and above? Since P5 all processors have FPU integrated. And if not, this is problem of developer to provide system-level support for coprocessor. > > > > What do you think? > > > > Looking forward for your answer, > > Nic Tiger. > > > > P.S. By the way, using complex numbers with simplicity you provided is great! > > > > > > |
Copyright © 1999-2021 by the D Language Foundation