March 11, 2017 Re: VisualD no intellisense | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Rainer Schuetze | On Saturday, 4 March 2017 at 08:00:55 UTC, Rainer Schuetze wrote:
>
>
> On 22.02.2017 18:29, Jolly James wrote:
>>>
>>> Or do you mean that the snippets should be part of the completion
>>> list? Sounds reasonable...
>>
>> Yep, I would have expected them to be in the completion list.
>
> You can now find code snippets added to the completion list in https://github.com/dlang/visuald/releases/tag/v0.44-rc2
Anyway, that strange kind of "IntelliSense" feels more like random-insert than auto-complete.
Regards,
Grander
|
March 11, 2017 Re: VisualD no intellisense | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Grander | On Saturday, 11 March 2017 at 01:06:07 UTC, Grander wrote:
> On Saturday, 4 March 2017 at 08:00:55 UTC, Rainer Schuetze wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 22.02.2017 18:29, Jolly James wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Or do you mean that the snippets should be part of the completion
>>>> list? Sounds reasonable...
>>>
>>> Yep, I would have expected them to be in the completion list.
>>
>> You can now find code snippets added to the completion list in https://github.com/dlang/visuald/releases/tag/v0.44-rc2
>
> Anyway, that strange kind of "IntelliSense" feels more like random-insert than auto-complete.
>
> Regards,
> Grander
... in general (I have not even thought of that snippet insertion-bullshit-usability)
|
April 08, 2017 Re: VisualD no intellisense | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Grander | On Saturday, 11 March 2017 at 01:06:07 UTC, Grander wrote:
> On Saturday, 4 March 2017 at 08:00:55 UTC, Rainer Schuetze wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 22.02.2017 18:29, Jolly James wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Or do you mean that the snippets should be part of the completion
>>>> list? Sounds reasonable...
>>>
>>> Yep, I would have expected them to be in the completion list.
>>
>> You can now find code snippets added to the completion list in https://github.com/dlang/visuald/releases/tag/v0.44-rc2
>
> Anyway, that strange kind of "IntelliSense" feels more like random-insert than auto-complete.
>
> Regards,
> Grander
I assume you also come from C# development.
Therefore, I suggest you to try coding C or C++ in Visual Studio (or even worse: try Atmel Studio). You will have pretty the same user experience like with D.
For those who do not know, what I mean: It does not feel that smooth and straight forward like programming C#, e.g. in C# Visual Studio makes suggestions based on great code analysis and shows all usefull (as far as I remember, VisualD often also shows syntactically incorrect ones) possibilities (but pre-selects the most-likely best one in the IntelliSense box).
|
Copyright © 1999-2021 by the D Language Foundation