I have the version 2.4.2 of wxWindows ... Will the compile and install instructions on the digital mars website work with this release as well? They are written for 2.4.1.

for 2,4.2 i hope all the bugs in 2.4.1 were removed. You should get the library just by going to wxwindows\src\msw and doing make -f makefile.sc

chris

Roger deBry wrote:

> I have the version 2.4.2 of wxWindows ... Will the compile and install
> instructions on the digital mars website work with this release as well? They
> are written for 2.4.1.
> 
> 

Let me know if you have the same problem than me (see the previous posts in
the list)

thanks,
Denis

"Roger deBry" <Roger_member@pathlink.com> a écrit dans le message de news:bu6bg0$2ema$1@digitaldaemon.com...
> I have the version 2.4.2 of wxWindows ... Will the compile and install instructions on the digital mars website work with this release as well?
They
> are written for 2.4.1.
>
>

In article <bu8gcm$2il$1@digitaldaemon.com>, Denis Crespe says...
>
>Let me know if you have the same problem than me (see the previous posts in
>the list)
>
>thanks,
>Denis
>
>"Roger deBry" <Roger_member@pathlink.com> a écrit dans le message de news:bu6bg0$2ema$1@digitaldaemon.com...
>> I have the version 2.4.2 of wxWindows ... Will the compile and install instructions on the digital mars website work with this release as well?
>They
>> are written for 2.4.1.
>>
>>
>
>
Yes, I had the same problem. Looks like a bug.

In article <bu8v0j$qvf$1@digitaldaemon.com>, Roger deBry says...
>
>In article <bu8gcm$2il$1@digitaldaemon.com>, Denis Crespe says...
>>
>>Let me know if you have the same problem than me (see the previous posts in
>>the list)
>>
>>thanks,
>>Denis
>>
>>"Roger deBry" <Roger_member@pathlink.com> a écrit dans le message de news:bu6bg0$2ema$1@digitaldaemon.com...
>>> I have the version 2.4.2 of wxWindows ... Will the compile and install instructions on the digital mars website work with this release as well?
>>They
>>> are written for 2.4.1.
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>Yes, I had the same problem. Looks like a bug.
>
>Okay, I commented out line 1029 as suggested in previous post on this subjedt and the compile worked okay. I have managed to compile one or two of the samples as well, so it looks like all is well. Thanks to all for the help on this newsgroup.