J C Calvarese wrote:
> 
> I've got no beef with ECMA script or JavaScript in particular. As far as Microsoft's proprietary languages, I prefer VBScript to JScript because I'm more confortable with BASIC syntax and it has a "for each".

JavaScript has:

	for (var key in array)
		alert(key + " -> " + array[key]);

Which is essentially "for each".  Works on associatives and arrays - which are essentially the same thing, mind you.

-[Unknown]

"J Anderson" <REMOVEanderson@badmama.com.au> wrote in message news:c71ts1$2qr7$1@digitaldaemon.com...
> Phill wrote:
>
> >"J Anderson" <REMOVEanderson@badmama.com.au> wrote in message news:c71eva$228o$1@digitaldaemon.com...
> >
> >
> >>Scott Egan wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>(I found the use of just the varible names in the with block a bit
> >>>
> >>>
> >uncomfortable).
> >
> >
> >>>
> >>>
> >>You've had to much VB.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >Is that Victorian Bitter? or Visual Basic?
> >Or both?
> >
> >Phill
> >
>
> Doesn't matter, they both make you look stupid.  I apologise, I just couldn't resist.
>
true true :o))

Unknown W. Brackets wrote:
> J C Calvarese wrote:
> 
>>
>> I've got no beef with ECMA script or JavaScript in particular. As far as Microsoft's proprietary languages, I prefer VBScript to JScript because I'm more confortable with BASIC syntax and it has a "for each".
> 
> 
> JavaScript has:
> 
>     for (var key in array)
>         alert(key + " -> " + array[key]);
> 
> Which is essentially "for each".  Works on associatives and arrays - which are essentially the same thing, mind you.
> 
> -[Unknown]

Thanks for the correction.

-- 
Justin
http://jcc_7.tripod.com/d/