June 16, 2004 Re: Detroit pistons rule! <sings>Lets get it started..</sings> | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Charlie | And with all ths banter, I guess I could have posted about the Tampa Bay Lightning winning the Stanley Cup !! |
June 16, 2004 Re: Detroit pistons rule! <sings>Lets get it started..</sings> | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Carlos Santander B. | "Carlos Santander B." <carlos8294@msn.com> escribió en el mensaje news:calclb$2o6i$1@digitaldaemon.com | "Charlie" <Charlie_member@pathlink.com> escribió en el mensaje | news:cal2hr$27sf$1@digitaldaemon.com... ||| but let's just wait until tuesday night... ||| || || Yes, where they'll clench it :). No team has come back from 3 - 1 to win, | but || theres a first for everything. || || | | And no home team has won the three middle games, but there's a first for | everything. | | ----------------------- | Carlos Santander Bernal And there it is! ----------------------- Carlos Santander Bernal |
June 16, 2004 Re: Detroit pistons rule! <sings>Lets get it started..</sings> | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Carlos Santander B. | :), You know what was hilarious, did you see those two coolers full of MUMM's !! LOL , Its like the cheapest champagne there is , $5 a bottle. Hilarity. C In article <caofmj$1asj$1@digitaldaemon.com>, Carlos Santander B. says... > >"Carlos Santander B." <carlos8294@msn.com> escribió en el mensaje >news:calclb$2o6i$1@digitaldaemon.com >| "Charlie" <Charlie_member@pathlink.com> escribió en el mensaje >| news:cal2hr$27sf$1@digitaldaemon.com... >||| but let's just wait until tuesday night... >||| >|| >|| Yes, where they'll clench it :). No team has come back from 3 - 1 to >win, >| but >|| theres a first for everything. >|| >|| >| >| And no home team has won the three middle games, but there's a first for >| everything. >| >| ----------------------- >| Carlos Santander Bernal > >And there it is! > >----------------------- >Carlos Santander Bernal > > |
June 17, 2004 Re: Detroit pistons rule! <sings>Lets get it started..</sings> | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Matthew | "Matthew" <admin@stlsoft.dot.dot.dot.dot.org> wrote in message news:caje01$2kof$1@digitaldaemon.com... > > "Sam McCall" <tunah.d@tunah.net> wrote in message news:cajcdk$2hgb$1@digitaldaemon.com... > > Matthew wrote: > > > > > Is this related to some sporting pastime whose name is a malapropism, with > > > respect to its primary mechanism and form? In other words, American > *foot*ball? > > > > > > Here is Aus, they insist on calling football "soccer", and calling the three > > > different kinds of rugby-like sports "football". Go figure! > > Hey, I'm a kiwi, and take exception to any suggestion that aussie rules is rugby-like :-P > > Sorry, I should have been more specific. They are three sports that involve large > men who have insufficient ball control to cheat and pick up the ball and run > around and throw it to each other. > > :-) > > Actually, to be serious, since I've been here 7 years, and my in-laws are BIG > rugby union people, I've come to sort of enjoy rugby union a little, in internationall games at least. But Aussie rules just seems a little silly; the > extremely short and tight shorts and lack of sleeves don't help, albeit I'm aware > that the ladies like this aspect. And RL is the ugliest game in the world, played > by the dumbest men in the universe. > > For the non-Australasians reading this, there've recently been a spate of "shocking revelations" about the exploits of the professional rugby league players here in Aus, including a number of different allegations of pack rape. > The country has been stunned to learn that if you get bands of ill/un-educated, > not very bright to start with, young men, pay them hundreds of thousands of > dollars a year, pander to their every whim, laud them above all other members of > your society, and surround them with adoring women, then they'll develop a disproportionate impression of their own self-worth and have no respect for > women. Big shock! > > My sons both appear to be likely to develop my physical size, and the sporting > skills - which skipped me <g> - of their grandfathers. We've already decided that > the morally corrupt Rugby League institutions in this country aren't gettting a p > aw on them, at any stage of their development. F-ing cretins! > > Mr hot air. > > P.S. Since the boys could play union for either England or Australia, we've > decided that if they look like there's a chance they might be good enough, we'll > move to NZ at a suitable age, so they can play for the one team that plays with > beauty and passion. ;) > > |
Copyright © 1999-2021 by the D Language Foundation