First of all, I'm not an English speaker. So be tolerant of my poor English.

I'm using Win32 compiler v0.135.
I wrote the following code and had some problems:

int main()
{
Object c = new Object;
Object d = null;
if (null == c) {}  // Access Violation
if (c == null) {}  // Ok
if (d == c) {}     // Access Violation
if (c == d) {}     // Ok

bit b;
b = (1 == 2);      // Ok
b = (c == d);      // Compile Error(cannot convert int to bit)

return 0;
}

I'm sorry if these are known issues...

In article <dieq96$187c$1@digitaldaemon.com>, Niboshi says...
>
>First of all, I'm not an English speaker. So be tolerant of my poor English.
>
>I'm using Win32 compiler v0.135.
>I wrote the following code and had some problems:
>
>int main()
>{
>Object c = new Object;
>Object d = null;
>if (null == c) {}  // Access Violation
>if (c == null) {}  // Ok
>if (d == c) {}     // Access Violation
>if (c == d) {}     // Ok


All of these should use the "is" operator.

# if(null is c){}
# if(c is null){}
# ...



>
>bit b;
>b = (1 == 2);      // Ok
>b = (c == d);      // Compile Error(cannot convert int to bit)
>
>return 0;
>}
>
>I'm sorry if these are known issues...
>
>


Your English is better than some of the postings from English speakers (my self
included).

In article <dif1c1$5cm$1@digitaldaemon.com>, BCS says...
>
>In article <dieq96$187c$1@digitaldaemon.com>, Niboshi says...
>>
>>First of all, I'm not an English speaker. So be tolerant of my poor English.
>>
>>I'm using Win32 compiler v0.135.
>>I wrote the following code and had some problems:
>>
>>int main()
>>{
>>Object c = new Object;
>>Object d = null;
>>if (null == c) {}  // Access Violation
>>if (c == null) {}  // Ok
>>if (d == c) {}     // Access Violation
>>if (c == d) {}     // Ok
>
>
>All of these should use the "is" operator.
>
># if(null is c){}
># if(c is null){}
># ...
>
>
>
>>
>>bit b;
>>b = (1 == 2);      // Ok
>>b = (c == d);      // Compile Error(cannot convert int to bit)
>>
>>return 0;
>>}
>>
>>I'm sorry if these are known issues...
>>
>>
>
>
>Your English is better than some of the postings from English speakers (my self
>included).
>
>

Thanks a lot! I should have read documentation more carefully before posting :)