Is std.perf just undocumented because of the doxygen thing, or is it not an official part of Phobos? I couldn't google-fu the answer.

Lutger wrote:
> Is std.perf just undocumented because of the doxygen thing, or is it not an official part of Phobos? I couldn't google-fu the answer.

Honestly, I think its just an oversight.  D's perf module is actually a port, however, of a C++ library (STLSoft:WinSTL).  The best I can recommend is to examine the D source (dmd/src/phobos/std/perf.d) and the documentation for the C++ version:
http://synesis.com.au/software/stlsoft/help/group__winstl__perf__library.html

-- Christopher Nicholson-Sauls

I see, that explains the doxygen doc. It seems that ddoc can deal with doxygen in a reasonable way though. Initially I thought it might be like recls, still shipped with phobos but not really a part of it as I understand.

Chris Nicholson-Sauls wrote:
> Lutger wrote:
>> Is std.perf just undocumented because of the doxygen thing, or is it not an official part of Phobos? I couldn't google-fu the answer.
> 
> Honestly, I think its just an oversight.  D's perf module is actually a port, however, of a C++ library (STLSoft:WinSTL).  The best I can recommend is to examine the D source (dmd/src/phobos/std/perf.d) and the documentation for the C++ version:
> http://synesis.com.au/software/stlsoft/help/group__winstl__perf__library.html 
> 
> 
> -- Christopher Nicholson-Sauls