Bit of an an off topic post, but any opinions on Hare (https://harelang.org) in relation to D in the realm of "better C" languages?

- MJ

On Friday, 29 April 2022 at 01:56:35 UTC, Marc Jones wrote:
> Bit of an an off topic post, but any opinions on Hare (https://harelang.org) in relation to D in the realm of "better C" languages?
>
> - MJ

It looked annoying, lacked significant meta programming(I don't see op overloads or templates as major features) and was paying lip service to rust when it called about "thinking about memory with ownership" when I doubt they have whatever rust is doing but at the same time suggests that's their target

On Friday, 29 April 2022 at 01:56:35 UTC, Marc Jones wrote:
> Bit of an an off topic post, but any opinions on Hare (https://harelang.org) in relation to D in the realm of "better C" languages?
>
> - MJ

Looks more like a worseGo

Looks nice, no windows unfortunately, I don't use that OS but I target it, it's not even listed in the roadmap, that'll hurt them imo..

They got tagged union, D, please!

On Friday, 29 April 2022 at 09:16:28 UTC, ryuukk_ wrote:
> Looks nice, no windows unfortunately, I don't use that OS but I target it, it's not even listed in the roadmap, that'll hurt them imo..

feature honestly. Maybe I should learn it.