Thread overview | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
April 29, 2022 [OT] Hare - Another "Better C" Language | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Bit of an an off topic post, but any opinions on Hare (https://harelang.org) in relation to D in the realm of "better C" languages? - MJ |
April 29, 2022 Re: [OT] Hare - Another "Better C" Language | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Marc Jones | On Friday, 29 April 2022 at 01:56:35 UTC, Marc Jones wrote:
> Bit of an an off topic post, but any opinions on Hare (https://harelang.org) in relation to D in the realm of "better C" languages?
>
> - MJ
It looked annoying, lacked significant meta programming(I don't see op overloads or templates as major features) and was paying lip service to rust when it called about "thinking about memory with ownership" when I doubt they have whatever rust is doing but at the same time suggests that's their target
|
April 29, 2022 Re: [OT] Hare - Another "Better C" Language | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Marc Jones | On Friday, 29 April 2022 at 01:56:35 UTC, Marc Jones wrote:
> Bit of an an off topic post, but any opinions on Hare (https://harelang.org) in relation to D in the realm of "better C" languages?
>
> - MJ
Looks more like a worseGo
|
April 29, 2022 Re: [OT] Hare - Another "Better C" Language | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to bauss | Looks nice, no windows unfortunately, I don't use that OS but I target it, it's not even listed in the roadmap, that'll hurt them imo.. They got tagged union, D, please! |
May 01, 2022 Re: [OT] Hare - Another "Better C" Language | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to ryuukk_ | On Friday, 29 April 2022 at 09:16:28 UTC, ryuukk_ wrote:
> Looks nice, no windows unfortunately, I don't use that OS but I target it, it's not even listed in the roadmap, that'll hurt them imo..
feature honestly. Maybe I should learn it.
|
Copyright © 1999-2021 by the D Language Foundation