Tom S wrote:
> Tyler Knott wrote:
>>
>>> I think Jan's server is holding up well. So far today, traffic is 10x normal.
>>
>> The server may be, but the bandwidth isn't.  Right now I'm getting ~10 Kb/s downloading dmd.1.00.zip
> 
> 10Kb/s ? :o woaah, lucky one :P

I've been pleasantly suprised at the robustness of the server, however as others have stated, the throughput is abysmal.

On my parents cable I got 2K/s on average.

Chris Nicholson-Sauls wrote:
> Walter Bright wrote:
>>
>>
>> http://www.digitalmars.com/d/changelog.html
>>
>> http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.1.00.zip
> 
> I've got the Chartreuse out and toasting it as we "speak".  :)  Heck of an update even had it been without the one-point-oh moniker, though!  (Insert recurring Walter-squash-bugs jokes here.)
> 
> Let's see if this momentum carries.  And what will happen now in library land!
> 
> -- Chris Nicholson-Sauls

We shall dance the _Tango_ all decade long.

Chris Nicholson-Sauls wrote:
> I've got the Chartreuse out and toasting it as we "speak".  :)  Heck of an update even had it been without the one-point-oh moniker, though!  (Insert recurring Walter-squash-bugs jokes here.)

Good point ! I dug out some Sheridan's for the occasion :-D

Tom S wrote:
> Tyler Knott wrote:
>>
>>> I think Jan's server is holding up well. So far today, traffic is 10x normal.
>>
>> The server may be, but the bandwidth isn't.  Right now I'm getting ~10 Kb/s downloading dmd.1.00.zip
> 
> 10Kb/s ? :o woaah, lucky one :P

I was downloading it to my shared web hosting (which presumably has tons of downstream bandwidth) for easy mirroring, though because DMD is copyrighted by Walter I won't make my mirror public without his permission.

P.S.: The MD5sum of dmd.1.00.zip is d237f95ed2c576438e0252b890e83075 in case you want to verify any mirrors that sprout up.

Walter Bright wrote:
> http://www.digitalmars.com/d/changelog.html
> 
> http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.1.00.zip

Walter,

Heartfelt congratulations from your friends at dsource.org!  I hope the mirror is okay...

Mirror:  ftp://63.99.9.206/dmd.1.00.zip

BA

std.compiler
    uint version_major = 0;
    uint version_minor = 176;	/// ditto

Whoops.

Kyle Furlong wrote:
> Chris Nicholson-Sauls wrote:
>> Walter Bright wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> http://www.digitalmars.com/d/changelog.html
>>>
>>> http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.1.00.zip
>>
>> I've got the Chartreuse out and toasting it as we "speak".  :)  Heck of an update even had it been without the one-point-oh moniker, though!  (Insert recurring Walter-squash-bugs jokes here.)
>>
>> Let's see if this momentum carries.  And what will happen now in library land!
>>
>> -- Chris Nicholson-Sauls
> 
> We shall dance the _Tango_ all decade long.

And eat _Cashew_s and _Mango_s for energy.  ;)

-- Chris Nicholson-Sauls

I guess in Walter-speak, "not ready yet" means "give me 4 more hours or so."  Congratulations!  I know it's been a long road, and it must feel wonderful to have this release out the door.  Here's to many more years of D! :-)


Sean

Tyler Knott wrote:
> Tom S wrote:
>> Tyler Knott wrote:
>>>
>>>> I think Jan's server is holding up well. So far today, traffic is 10x normal.
>>>
>>> The server may be, but the bandwidth isn't.  Right now I'm getting ~10 Kb/s downloading dmd.1.00.zip
>>
>> 10Kb/s ? :o woaah, lucky one :P
> 
> I was downloading it to my shared web hosting (which presumably has tons of downstream bandwidth) for easy mirroring, though because DMD is copyrighted by Walter I won't make my mirror public without his permission.
> 
> P.S.: The MD5sum of dmd.1.00.zip is d237f95ed2c576438e0252b890e83075 in case you want to verify any mirrors that sprout up.

I just like to keep a count of the number of downloads. If there are a bunch of mirrors, it starts getting hard to keep track of. Also, dmd gets updated frequently, and I'd like to make sure that people downloading new versions are getting the latest one, not an old one from a mirror that has been overlooked.

But obviously a mirror would help for the moment. Could you stick one up just for the next couple of days?

Chris Miller wrote:
> std.compiler
>     uint version_major = 0;
>     uint version_minor = 176;    /// ditto
> 
> Whoops.

There's always something I miss. :-(