When I compile (v1.0) the following code for some reason opIndexDg's stack pointer is null and opIndexAssignDg's stack pointer is not.

----------------
  struct S
  {
    real delegate(size_t i, size_t j) opIndexDg;
    real delegate(real r, size_t i, size_t j) opIndexAssignDg;

    void dbg()
    {
      printf("&opIndexDg : [%X]\n", &opIndexDg );
      printf("     func -> [%X]\n", opIndexDg.funcptr );
      printf("    stack -> [%X]\n", opIndexDg.ptr );

      printf("&opIndexAssignDg : [%X]\n", &opIndexAssignDg );
      printf("           func -> [%X]\n", opIndexAssignDg.funcptr );
      printf("          stack -> [%X]\n", &opIndexAssignDg.ptr );
    }

  };


  int main(char[][] args)
  {
    S s;
    s.dbg();
    return 0;
  }
----------------

Output:

----------------

&opIndexDg : [12FF28]
     func -> [0]
    stack -> [0]
&opIndexAssignDg : [12FF30]
           func -> [0]
          stack -> [12FF30]

nobody wrote:
> When I compile (v1.0) the following code for some reason opIndexDg's stack pointer is null and opIndexAssignDg's stack pointer is not.
> 
> ----------------
[snip]
>       printf("    stack -> [%X]\n", opIndexDg.ptr );
[snip]
>       printf("          stack -> [%X]\n", &opIndexAssignDg.ptr );
                                            ^ You have an extra '&' here

If you remove that it should also be null (it was for me).
The address you were printing was where the null pointer was stored, not the null pointer itself :P.

Frits van Bommel wrote:
> nobody wrote:
>> When I compile (v1.0) the following code for some reason opIndexDg's stack pointer is null and opIndexAssignDg's stack pointer is not.
>>
>> ----------------
> [snip]
>>       printf("    stack -> [%X]\n", opIndexDg.ptr );
> [snip]
>>       printf("          stack -> [%X]\n", &opIndexAssignDg.ptr );
>                                             ^ You have an extra '&' here
> 
> If you remove that it should also be null (it was for me).
> The address you were printing was where the null pointer was stored, not the null pointer itself :P.

Thanks that certainly was just a typo on my part!