d-bugmail@puremagic.com wrote:
> http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2313
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ------- Comment #8 from lio+bugzilla@lunesu.com  2008-08-27 06:39 -------
> Created an attachment (id=273)
>  --> (http://d.puremagic.com/issues/attachment.cgi?id=273&action=view)
> assembly for _d_arrayappendcT using the original byte[] copy
> 
> 
There you go. Uses rep movsb instead of rep movsd. Immediately 4X slower than it could be.

Thing is, the compiler already knows ew're appending to an int[], so it shouldn't even be using a generic append routine if you ask me.

L.