On Wednesday, 21 July 2021 at 21:04:56 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
>On 7/21/2021 12:08 PM, russhy wrote:
> >And the default constructor,
Why can't it like C++
: T t;
That's all.
Many C++ programmers want to have constructors like C++
as T t{...};
.
It's been discussed many times. It comes up once a year or so.
I really don't understand. Isn't d
called pragmatism
?
That's so much a little bit of improvement, d can attract a bunch of c++ people, and I don't know why not to do it
?
Some people say that when using d
, the friction force is small. Since this is an advantage, why not strengthen
it?
For the so-called consistency
? Are you not against what is called consistency
?