September 24, 2008 Re: [Issue 1604] Non-final method on final struct is too restrictive | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to d-bugmail | d-bugmail@puremagic.com wrote: > http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1604 > > > > > > ------- Comment #9 from smjg@iname.com 2008-09-22 08:31 ------- > (In reply to comment #8) >> You can read about D2 const here: http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/const3.html >> Don't try to compare to the D1 system, it's way different, so it's better to >> take a fresh start. > > You seem to have got things confused. final wasn't part of any D1 const > system. My query was about the differences between the current D2 const system > and the two previous D2 const systems (2.008 and 2.000-2.007, if the changelog > is to go by). We really need a side-by-side comparison, for both historical > and practical interest. > > Oops, my bad. I don't recall the other previous const systems, as there was lots of confusion then. I myself got some of the previous iterations confused with each other. So, I would still say it's probably best to just take a fresh look. -- Bruno Medeiros - Software Developer, MSc. in CS/E graduate http://www.prowiki.org/wiki4d/wiki.cgi?BrunoMedeiros#D |
August 25, 2009 [Issue 1604] Non-final method on final struct is too restrictive | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to d-bugmail | http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1604 Andrei Alexandrescu <andrei@metalanguage.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |INVALID --- Comment #10 from Andrei Alexandrescu <andrei@metalanguage.com> 2009-08-24 22:21:46 PDT --- Obsoleted by the elimination of final values. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- |
Copyright © 1999-2021 by the D Language Foundation