Hello, guys!
Wanna to investigate in LDC on windows, but can't compile druntime.

druntime-ldc\src\rt\trace.d(836): Error: statement not allowed in naked function

Seems to be LDC mistake.

Also there is many errors in stdio.d

.\phobos-ldc\std\stdio.d(618): Error: undefined identifier '_fileno'
.\phobos-ldc\std\stdio.d(619): Error: undefined identifier '_setmode'
.\phobos-ldc\std\stdio.d(619): Error: undefined identifier _O_BINARY
.\phobos-ldc\std\stdio.d(620): Error: undefined identifier '_setmode'

Seems that ldc doesn't support MSVC I/O.

Also errors in mixins

.\phobos-ldc\std\internal\digest\sha_SSSE3.d(651): Error: matching '}' expected, not end of file

std.bigint failing to compile:

<inline asm>:1:2: error: unknown directive
        .section        .gnu.linkonce.t._D3std8internal4math10biguintx8634__T24multibyteIncrementAssignVa45Z24multibyteIncrementAssignFNaAkkZk,"ax"
        ^
<inline asm>:17:2: error: unknown directive
        .section        .gnu.linkonce.t._D3std8internal4math10biguintx8634__T24multibyteIncrementAssignVa43Z24multibyteIncrementAssignFNaAkkZk,"ax"
        ^
<inline asm>:33:2: error: unknown directive
        .section        .gnu.linkonce.t._D3std8internal4math10biguintx8625__T15multibyteMulAddVa45Z15multibyteMulAddFNaAkxAkkkZk,"ax"
        ^
<inline asm>:100:2: error: unknown directive
        .section        .gnu.linkonce.t._D3std8internal4math10biguintx8625__T15multibyteMulAddVa43Z15multibyteMulAddFNaAkxAkkkZk,"ax"
        ^
LLVM ERROR: Error parsing inline asm

On Thursday, 5 September 2013 at 17:16:41 UTC, Temtaime wrote:
> Hello, guys!
> Wanna to investigate in LDC on windows, but can't compile druntime.
>
> druntime-ldc\src\rt\trace.d(836): Error: statement not allowed in naked function
>
> Seems to be LDC mistake.

Hi,

how to you compile LDC? rt.trace.d is a part of druntime which is not supported by LDC on all platforms - it's excluded in the CMakeLists.txt file.

In general, LDC can be compiled on Windows 64 using CMake with the instructions from the wiki (http://wiki.dlang.org/Building_and_hacking_LDC_on_Windows_using_MSVC).

And yes, it is still alpha and every help is welcome.

Regards
Kai

Little bit of good news from LLVM and GoingNative
http://blog.llvm.org/2013/09/a-path-forward-for-llvm-toolchain-on.html

I'm trying to make custom project to build druntime.

Okay, i'm just dropped that file, thanks.

There is some strange errors
phobos-ldc.lib(ti_ulong.obj) : error LNK2001: unresolved external symbol __D9inv
ariant12_d_invariantFC6ObjectZv@4
phobos-ldc.lib(ti_ushort.obj) : error LNK2001: unresolved external symbol __D9in
variant12_d_invariantFC6ObjectZv@4
phobos-ldc.lib(ti_int.obj) : error LNK2001: unresolved external symbol __D9invar
iant12_d_invariantFC6ObjectZv@4
phobos-ldc.lib(ti_uint.obj) : error LNK2001: unresolved external symbol __D9inva
riant12_d_invariantFC6ObjectZv@4

Any ideas?

On Friday, 6 September 2013 at 15:48:08 UTC, Michael wrote:
> Little bit of good news from LLVM and GoingNative
> http://blog.llvm.org/2013/09/a-path-forward-for-llvm-toolchain-on.html

Yeah, nice. But my patches for Win64 EH support are still in the review queue.

Kai

On Friday, 6 September 2013 at 18:44:05 UTC, Kai Nacke wrote:
> On Friday, 6 September 2013 at 15:48:08 UTC, Michael wrote:
>> Little bit of good news from LLVM and GoingNative
>> http://blog.llvm.org/2013/09/a-path-forward-for-llvm-toolchain-on.html
>
> Yeah, nice. But my patches for Win64 EH support are still in the review queue.
>
> Kai

I found somewhere (maybe in rust mail-lists) that patent in this field will expire at spring 2014 ;)

On Friday, 6 September 2013 at 19:31:08 UTC, Michael wrote:
> On Friday, 6 September 2013 at 18:44:05 UTC, Kai Nacke wrote:
>> On Friday, 6 September 2013 at 15:48:08 UTC, Michael wrote:
>>> Little bit of good news from LLVM and GoingNative
>>> http://blog.llvm.org/2013/09/a-path-forward-for-llvm-toolchain-on.html
>>
>> Yeah, nice. But my patches for Win64 EH support are still in the review queue.
>>
>> Kai
>
> I found somewhere (maybe in rust mail-lists) that patent in this field will expire at spring 2014 ;)

Nope. There is no patent on the Win64 EH handling. (But there is a patent on Win32 EH handling which expires next year.) It is simply that it is hard to get reviews.

Kai