Thread overview | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
August 06, 2013 Question on multiprecision types | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Does D support types like cpp_int or cpp_rational in boost::multiprecision? D is designed directly mapped to hardware for speed reason. But in some cases, we do need types like cpp_int or cpp_rational support. |
August 06, 2013 Re: Question on multiprecision types | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to SteveGuo | Is there a plan to support those kind of types? If support, is it a core language feature or library support? |
August 06, 2013 Re: Question on multiprecision types | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to SteveGuo | SteveGuo: > Is there a plan to support those kind of types? If support, > is it a core language feature or library support? That will not have a core language support, beside perhaps cent/ucent. At the moment there are no plans for library support, but eventually in some years fixed-size multi-precision integers will be good to have in Phobos, just like several other things, like nD packed arrays (http://pempek.net/articles/2013/08/03/packedarray-random-access-array-tightly-packed-unsigned-integers/ ) etc. Bye, bearophile |
August 06, 2013 Re: Question on multiprecision types | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to bearophile | > That will not have a core language support, beside perhaps cent/ucent. At the moment there are no plans for library support, but eventually in some years fixed-size multi-precision integers will be good to have in Phobos, just like several other things, like nD packed arrays (http://pempek.net/articles/2013/08/03/packedarray-random-access-array-tightly-packed-unsigned-integers/ ) etc.
>
> Bye,
> bearophile
Thanks for replying:) I have to choose c++ on my project. Though I love D.
|
August 06, 2013 Re: Question on multiprecision types | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to SteveGuo | SteveGuo:
> I have to choose c++ on my project.
Are std.bigint not efficient enough?
Bye,
bearophile
|
August 06, 2013 Re: Question on multiprecision types | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to bearophile |
> Are std.bigint not efficient enough?
>
> Bye,
> bearophile
std.bigint, I think it's an equevelent of cpp_int, but My project has to use cpp_rational
|
August 06, 2013 Re: Question on multiprecision types | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to SteveGuo | SteveGuo:
> std.bigint, I think it's an equevelent of cpp_int, but My project has to use cpp_rational
A rational was implemented in D by several persons, it's easy. Of the few problems is implement an efficient GCD among bigints (that sooner or later will be needed in std.bigint).
Bye,
bearophile
|
August 06, 2013 Re: Question on multiprecision types | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to bearophile | > A rational was implemented in D by several persons, it's easy. Of the few problems is implement an efficient GCD among bigints (that sooner or later will be needed in std.bigint).
>
> Bye,
> bearophile
That's great!
|
August 10, 2013 Re: Question on multiprecision types | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to SteveGuo | On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 07:43:29AM +0200, SteveGuo wrote: > Does D support types like cpp_int or cpp_rational in boost::multiprecision? D is designed directly mapped to hardware for speed reason. But in some cases, we do need types like cpp_int or cpp_rational support. There's std.bigint, but I don't know whether there's a rational library yet. But you can probably use BigInt to implement one. T -- Help a man when he is in trouble and he will remember you when he is in trouble again. |
Copyright © 1999-2021 by the D Language Foundation