August 01, 2014 Re: SDC-32bit | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to ketmar | On Friday, 1 August 2014 at 16:31:49 UTC, ketmar via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
> On Fri, 01 Aug 2014 15:54:42 +0000
> Stefan Koch via Digitalmars-d-announce
> <digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote:
>
>> AFAICS this it because you are using dmd-master
>> if it fails with the dmd-2.065 then I have a real nut to crack
> sorry, you are right. downgrading to dmd-2.065 fixes the build.
OK I`am glad it was so easy
please try to compile a few tests and tell me if it works
|
August 01, 2014 Re: SDC-32bit | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Stefan Koch Attachments: | On Fri, 01 Aug 2014 16:33:39 +0000 Stefan Koch via Digitalmars-d-announce <digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote: > please try to compile a few tests and tell me if it works results of runner.d: http://dpaste.com/0P4DXGE |
August 01, 2014 Re: SDC-32bit | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to ketmar | On Friday, 1 August 2014 at 16:52:39 UTC, ketmar via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
> On Fri, 01 Aug 2014 16:33:39 +0000
> Stefan Koch via Digitalmars-d-announce
> <digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote:
>
>> please try to compile a few tests and tell me if it works
> results of runner.d: http://dpaste.com/0P4DXGE
Thats is just as excpected of those 15 failed tests 10 are expected to fail.
of the 5 regressions 4 are due to execption handling, and test0083 is empty because sdc32 segfaulted on that one
|
August 01, 2014 Re: SDC-32bit | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Stefan Koch Attachments: | On Fri, 01 Aug 2014 18:29:59 +0000 Stefan Koch via Digitalmars-d-announce <digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote: still, very impressive! |
August 01, 2014 Re: SDC-32bit | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to ketmar | Next time you might want to use my jsonRunner it runs 7.5x times faster than the old one :D thogh it needs a bit more work enableing multihtreading and such |
August 01, 2014 Re: SDC-32bit | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Stefan Koch Attachments: | On Fri, 01 Aug 2014 21:58:58 +0000 Stefan Koch via Digitalmars-d-announce <digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote: > enableing multihtreading and such i explititely passes runner.d -j1 (other cores has work to do too %-) |
August 01, 2014 Re: SDC-32bit | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to ketmar | first run "time ./runner" and then run "sh buildTester.sh && ./convtest" and then "time ./jsonRunner" i am intressted in your timings runner d envokes the sdc binary while jsonRunner is linked with sdc |
August 01, 2014 Re: SDC-32bit | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Stefan Koch Attachments: | On Fri, 01 Aug 2014 22:16:50 +0000 Stefan Koch via Digitalmars-d-announce <digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote: > sh buildTester.sh alas, i have no LLVMArchive, and it refuses to link without it. when i removed -L-lLLVMArchive, it says that /usr/lib/gcc/i486-slackware-linux/4.9.1/../../../libLLVMSupport.a(Process.o): In function `llvm::sys::Process::FileDescriptorHasColors(int)': Process.cpp:(.text+0x948): undefined reference to `setupterm' Process.cpp:(.text+0x962): undefined reference to `tigetnum' Process.cpp:(.text+0x975): undefined reference to `set_curterm' Process.cpp:(.text+0x97d): undefined reference to `del_curterm' collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status |
August 01, 2014 Re: SDC-32bit | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Attachments: | On Sat, 2 Aug 2014 01:37:33 +0300 ketmar via Digitalmars-d-announce <digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote: damn, it's hard to switch between two dmds. ok, i compiled everything, here's the timings: ./runner 2> /dev/null > /dev/null 21.39s user 1.48s system 146% cpu 15.643 total ./jsonRunner 2> /dev/null > /dev/null 2.60s user 0.76s system 86% cpu 3.899 total |
August 01, 2014 Re: SDC-32bit | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to ketmar | On Friday, 1 August 2014 at 22:44:48 UTC, ketmar via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
> On Sat, 2 Aug 2014 01:37:33 +0300
> ketmar via Digitalmars-d-announce
> <digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote:
>
> damn, it's hard to switch between two dmds. ok, i compiled everything,
> here's the timings:
>
> ./runner 2> /dev/null > /dev/null 21.39s user 1.48s system 146% cpu 15.643 total
> ./jsonRunner 2> /dev/null > /dev/null 2.60s user 0.76s system 86% cpu 3.899 total
Thanks
jsonRunner really runs fast ... io overhead really makes a diffrence
well I will go to bed now.
it's 1AM localtime
Thanks for your cooperation!
Good Night
|
Copyright © 1999-2021 by the D Language Foundation