Is there a way for the compiler to consider doc comments in auto generated, mixed in code?
E.g.

string fooImpl = q{
   /// Bar does fancy things.
   const void bar() { /*do something fancy*/ }
};

/// This is Foo
struct Foo(A, B, C) {
  mixin(fooImpl);
}

So that the documentation for struct Foo has that of the member bar() ?

On Friday, 23 July 2021 at 10:04:55 UTC, wjoe wrote:

string fooImpl = q{
   /// Bar does fancy things.
   const void bar() { /*do something fancy*/ }
};

/// This is Foo
struct Foo(A, B, C) {
  mixin(fooImpl);
}

unfortunately no and this is considered as a bug

On Friday, 23 July 2021 at 10:04:55 UTC, wjoe wrote:

If you use my adrdox generator (which runs on the dpldocs.info website), it handles mixin templates. See

http://dpldocs.info/experimental-docs/std.net.curl.HTTP.html#mixed-in-members

for example.

Mine also actually handles

mixin(q{
/// code
void foo() {}
});

as if it was direct.

But my generator only handles mixin templates and mixin string literals, not actually generated code returned from a function.

On Friday, 23 July 2021 at 10:42:22 UTC, user1234 wrote:

string fooImpl = q{
   /// Bar does fancy things.
   const void bar() { /*do something fancy*/ }
};

/// This is Foo
struct Foo(A, B, C) {
  mixin(fooImpl);
}

bummer but thanks for the link.