March 27, 2014 Annoying std.math issue | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Some time ago, Iain Buclaw kindly added non-asm implementations of math functions in std.math. However, CTFE still seems unable to correctly evaluate certain functions like atan2: import std.math; enum x = atan2(1.0, 2.0); Compiler output: /usr/src/d/phobos/std/math.d(856): Error: asm statements cannot be interpreted at compile time /usr/src/d/phobos/std/math.d(917): called from here: atan2(cast(real)y, cast(real)x) test.d(2): called from here: atan2(1.00000, 2.00000) Looking at std/math.d, it appears that version=InlineAsm_X86_Any is defined, which leads to the asm implementation of atan2, which CTFE can't interpret. However, right below that block is an else block containing a D implementation of atan2 that AFAICT *can* be interpreted in CTFE. So it would appear that version=InlineAsm_X86_Any should be suppressed during CTFE? But I'm not sure how this could be done in the compiler. In any case, it's an annoying limitation. :-( T -- Never step over a puddle, always step around it. Chances are that whatever made it is still dripping. |
March 27, 2014 Re: Annoying std.math issue | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to H. S. Teoh | On Thursday, 27 March 2014 at 18:18:25 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
> Some time ago, Iain Buclaw kindly added non-asm implementations of math
> functions in std.math. However, CTFE still seems unable to correctly
> evaluate certain functions like atan2:
>
> import std.math;
> enum x = atan2(1.0, 2.0);
>
> Compiler output:
>
> /usr/src/d/phobos/std/math.d(856): Error: asm statements cannot be interpreted at compile time
> /usr/src/d/phobos/std/math.d(917): called from here: atan2(cast(real)y, cast(real)x)
> test.d(2): called from here: atan2(1.00000, 2.00000)
>
> Looking at std/math.d, it appears that version=InlineAsm_X86_Any is
> defined, which leads to the asm implementation of atan2, which CTFE
> can't interpret.
>
> However, right below that block is an else block containing a D
> implementation of atan2 that AFAICT *can* be interpreted in CTFE.
>
> So it would appear that version=InlineAsm_X86_Any should be suppressed
> during CTFE? But I'm not sure how this could be done in the compiler.
>
> In any case, it's an annoying limitation. :-(
>
>
> T
//----
auto atan(double x)
{
version(InlineAsm_X86_Any)
if (!__ctfe)
{
asm
{
...
}
return;
}
Fall back non-InlineAsm_X86_Any and ctfe
}
//----
?
|
Copyright © 1999-2021 by the D Language Foundation