Hi,

Me again (it's been some time but it's about the same
problem)...I tried to compile LDC with the knew LLVM/clang I just
compile and stumble (not sure of the orthographe here) upon this
make error :

/home/cbrugel/Downloads/ldc/gen/dvalue.cpp:21:13: warning: ‘bool
checkVarValueType(llvm::Type*, bool)’ defined but not used
[-Wunused-function]
   static bool checkVarValueType(LLType* t, bool extraDeref)
               ^
[  9%] Building CXX object
CMakeFiles/LDCShared.dir/gen/warnings.cpp.o
[  9%] Building CXX object
CMakeFiles/LDCShared.dir/gen/typinf.cpp.o
[  9%] Building CXX object
CMakeFiles/LDCShared.dir/gen/abi-win64.cpp.o
[  9%] Building CXX object
CMakeFiles/LDCShared.dir/gen/llvmhelpers.cpp.o
/home/cbrugel/Downloads/ldc/gen/llvmhelpers.cpp: In function
‘DValue* DtoCastPtr(Loc&, DValue*, Type*)’:
/home/cbrugel/Downloads/ldc/gen/llvmhelpers.cpp:582:11: warning:
unused variable ‘fromtype’ [-Wunused-variable]
       Type* fromtype = val->getType()->toBasetype();
             ^
/home/cbrugel/Downloads/ldc/gen/llvmhelpers.cpp: In function
‘llvm::Constant* DtoConstExpInit(Loc&, Type*, Expression*)’:
/home/cbrugel/Downloads/ldc/gen/llvmhelpers.cpp:1368:28: warning:
unused variable ‘source’ [-Wunused-variable]
           llvm::IntegerType* source =
llvm::cast<llvm::IntegerType>(llType);
                              ^
/home/cbrugel/Downloads/ldc/gen/llvmhelpers.cpp: In function
‘DValue* DtoSymbolAddress(Loc&, Type*, Declaration*)’:
/home/cbrugel/Downloads/ldc/gen/llvmhelpers.cpp:1794:33: warning:
unused variable ‘t’ [-Wunused-variable]
                       llvm::Type* t =
llvm::cast<llvm::PointerType>(val->getType())->getElementType();
                                   ^
[  9%] Building CXX object
CMakeFiles/LDCShared.dir/gen/asmstmt.cpp.o
[  9%] Building CXX object
CMakeFiles/LDCShared.dir/gen/binops.cpp.o
[  9%] Building CXX object
CMakeFiles/LDCShared.dir/gen/optimizer.cpp.o
In file included from
/home/cbrugel/Downloads/ldc/gen/optimizer.cpp:12:0:
/home/cbrugel/Downloads/ldc/./gen/cl_helpers.h:32:11: error:
cannot derive from ‘final’ base ‘llvm::cl::parser<bool>’ in
derived type ‘opts::FlagParser’
       class FlagParser : public cl::parser<bool> {
             ^
CMakeFiles/LDCShared.dir/build.make:1883: recipe for target
'CMakeFiles/LDCShared.dir/gen/optimizer.cpp.o' failed
make[2]: *** [CMakeFiles/LDCShared.dir/gen/optimizer.cpp.o] Error
1
CMakeFiles/Makefile2:61: recipe for target
'CMakeFiles/LDCShared.dir/all' failed
make[1]: *** [CMakeFiles/LDCShared.dir/all] Error 2
Makefile:143: recipe for target 'all' failed
make: *** [all] Error 2

Any idea ? Anyway thanks a lot in advance for your help ! :)

Hi Matovitch!

On Sunday, 15 March 2015 at 14:10:49 UTC, matovitch wrote:
>
> Any idea ? Anyway thanks a lot in advance for your help ! :)

You are using LLVM trunk and I have not yet fixed all errors due to refactoring in the framework.

Quick fix: Comment out the FlagParser implementation and add this typedef:

typedef cl::parser<bool> FlagParser;

Regards,
Kai

On Sunday, 15 March 2015 at 14:24:05 UTC, Kai Nacke wrote:
> Hi Matovitch!
>
> On Sunday, 15 March 2015 at 14:10:49 UTC, matovitch wrote:
>>
>> Any idea ? Anyway thanks a lot in advance for your help ! :)
>
> You are using LLVM trunk and I have not yet fixed all errors due to refactoring in the framework.
>
> Quick fix: Comment out the FlagParser implementation and add this typedef:
>
> typedef cl::parser<bool> FlagParser;
>
> Regards,
> Kai

Hi Kai !

Thanks for your help and more generally for your work on LDC. I will probably encounter some other errors then...we'll see (...look back at his terminal...Yes ideed !). I don't know if someone would be interested by a temporary patch if ever I achive to build ldc...

Regards,
Matovitch

On Sunday, 15 March 2015 at 14:37:13 UTC, matovitch wrote:
> On Sunday, 15 March 2015 at 14:24:05 UTC, Kai Nacke wrote:
>> Hi Matovitch!
>>
>> On Sunday, 15 March 2015 at 14:10:49 UTC, matovitch wrote:
>>>
>>> Any idea ? Anyway thanks a lot in advance for your help ! :)
>>
>> You are using LLVM trunk and I have not yet fixed all errors due to refactoring in the framework.
>>
>> Quick fix: Comment out the FlagParser implementation and add this typedef:
>>
>> typedef cl::parser<bool> FlagParser;
>>
>> Regards,
>> Kai
>
> Hi Kai !
>
> Thanks for your help and more generally for your work on LDC. I will probably encounter some other errors then...we'll see (...look back at his terminal...Yes ideed !). I don't know if someone would be interested by a temporary patch if ever I achive to build ldc...
>
> Regards,
> Matovitch

5 minutes later...I am clearly not brave enough neither do I know llvm (well enougth) at all. I will use the right tag and try again. As we said in France for you : Bon courage !

Hi Matovitch!

On Sunday, 15 March 2015 at 14:37:13 UTC, matovitch wrote:
> (...look back at his terminal...Yes ideed !). I don't know if someone would be interested by a temporary patch if ever I achive to build ldc...

The LDC team is always interested in pull requests!

Regards,
Kai

On Sunday, 15 March 2015 at 14:37:13 UTC, matovitch wrote:
> On Sunday, 15 March 2015 at 14:24:05 UTC, Kai Nacke wrote:
>> Hi Matovitch!
>>
>> On Sunday, 15 March 2015 at 14:10:49 UTC, matovitch wrote:
>>>
>>> Any idea ? Anyway thanks a lot in advance for your help ! :)
>>
>> You are using LLVM trunk and I have not yet fixed all errors due to refactoring in the framework.
>>
>> Quick fix: Comment out the FlagParser implementation and add this typedef:
>>
>> typedef cl::parser<bool> FlagParser;
>>
>> Regards,
>> Kai
>
> Hi Kai !
>
> Thanks for your help and more generally for your work on LDC. I will probably encounter some other errors then...we'll see (...look back at his terminal...Yes ideed !). I don't know if someone would be interested by a temporary patch if ever I achive to build ldc...
>
> Regards,
> Matovitch

Hi Matovitch,

I have fixed all compile errors with LLVM 3.7 (from Sunday morning :-) ).

Maybe you want to give it a try...

Regards,
Kai

On Monday, 16 March 2015 at 07:00:32 UTC, Kai Nacke wrote:
> On Sunday, 15 March 2015 at 14:37:13 UTC, matovitch wrote:
>> On Sunday, 15 March 2015 at 14:24:05 UTC, Kai Nacke wrote:
>>> Hi Matovitch!
>>>
>>> On Sunday, 15 March 2015 at 14:10:49 UTC, matovitch wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Any idea ? Anyway thanks a lot in advance for your help ! :)
>>>
>>> You are using LLVM trunk and I have not yet fixed all errors due to refactoring in the framework.
>>>
>>> Quick fix: Comment out the FlagParser implementation and add this typedef:
>>>
>>> typedef cl::parser<bool> FlagParser;
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Kai
>>
>> Hi Kai !
>>
>> Thanks for your help and more generally for your work on LDC. I will probably encounter some other errors then...we'll see (...look back at his terminal...Yes ideed !). I don't know if someone would be interested by a temporary patch if ever I achive to build ldc...
>>
>> Regards,
>> Matovitch
>
> Hi Matovitch,
>
> I have fixed all compile errors with LLVM 3.7 (from Sunday morning :-) ).
>
> Maybe you want to give it a try...
>
> Regards,
> Kai

Hi Kai,

Awesome ! I will try this evenning (in about 8 hours) and let you know (I compiled LLVM from the HEAD there is no (3.7) tags on the git mirror so I am not sure of what you mean by 3.7). Thanks for your work !

Regards,
Matovitch

"matovitch" <camille.brugel@laposte.net> writes:

> Awesome ! I will try this evenning (in about 8 hours) and let you know
> (I compiled LLVM from the HEAD there is no (3.7) tags on the git
> mirror so I am not sure of what you mean by 3.7). Thanks for your work

Hi matovitch.  I think HEAD is called 3.7 until it is released.

On Monday, 16 March 2015 at 14:12:53 UTC, Dan Olson wrote:
> "matovitch" <camille.brugel@laposte.net> writes:
>
>> Awesome ! I will try this evenning (in about 8 hours) and let you know
>> (I compiled LLVM from the HEAD there is no (3.7) tags on the git
>> mirror so I am not sure of what you mean by 3.7). Thanks for your work
>
> Hi matovitch.  I think HEAD is called 3.7 until it is released.

Yes, that's true. LLVM head is the development stream for version 3.7, which will be released in autumn.

The LLVM people always refactor and improve things. That's why you sometimes get compile errors when building ldc. I try to keep up with the LLVM development, but sometimes I need simply more time...

I don't know why you are using LLVM head - if you only want to follow LDC development then you can/should use LLVM 3.6. (There is a tag/branch for 3.6).

Regards,
Kai

On Monday, 16 March 2015 at 17:49:45 UTC, Kai Nacke wrote:
> On Monday, 16 March 2015 at 14:12:53 UTC, Dan Olson wrote:
>> "matovitch" <camille.brugel@laposte.net> writes:
>>
>>> Awesome ! I will try this evenning (in about 8 hours) and let you know
>>> (I compiled LLVM from the HEAD there is no (3.7) tags on the git
>>> mirror so I am not sure of what you mean by 3.7). Thanks for your work
>>
>> Hi matovitch.  I think HEAD is called 3.7 until it is released.
>
> Yes, that's true. LLVM head is the development stream for version 3.7, which will be released in autumn.
>
> The LLVM people always refactor and improve things. That's why you sometimes get compile errors when building ldc. I try to keep up with the LLVM development, but sometimes I need simply more time...
>
> I don't know why you are using LLVM head - if you only want to follow LDC development then you can/should use LLVM 3.6. (There is a tag/branch for 3.6).
>
> Regards,
> Kai

Hi Kai,

It compiles ! Not without a fair amount of warnings though...Well I had no good reasons to use llvm HEAD. I just bought and mount my first PC and wanted to test a large compilation, then with llvm compiled I though why not trying to compile ldc with it. Now ready to code some D ! :D

Thanks again for your help,

Matovitch