July 09, 2018 Re: How about implementing SPMD on SIMD for D? | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Random D user | On Sunday, 8 July 2018 at 19:07:57 UTC, Random D user wrote:
>
> In my experience, you can only get the real benefits out of SIMD if you carefully handcraft your hot loops to fully use it. Sprinkling some SIMD here and there with a SIMD vector type, doesn't really seem to yield big benefits.
>
I agree. That's why it's useful to have a (stable) syntax for such instruction like PMADDWD that can't be described with just operator overloading.
|
Copyright © 1999-2021 by the D Language Foundation