| |
| Posted by forkit in reply to Paulo Pinto | PermalinkReply |
|
forkit
Posted in reply to Paulo Pinto
| On Sunday, 19 June 2022 at 08:13:54 UTC, Paulo Pinto wrote:
> On Sunday, 19 June 2022 at 07:06:21 UTC, forkit wrote:
>> On Sunday, 19 June 2022 at 07:01:38 UTC, forkit wrote:
>>> On Sunday, 19 June 2022 at 06:46:17 UTC, Paulo Pinto wrote:
>>>>
>>>> ..
>>>> As I already mentioned on the other thread, CS literature is full of various understandings of what is OOP all about.
>>>
>>> so is 20+ years of doing it ;-)
>>
>> also, by view of OOP, is that any principles you apply to it, confirm with principles in the real world.
>>
>> e.g. you cannot turn a cat into a mouse.
>>
>> although having said that, they're both made of molecules, that are made of atoms.
>>
>> so you can turn atoms, into molecules, and molecules into a cat, or a mouse.
>>
>> but as long as the cat is a cat, it's a cat, not a mouse.
>
> Last time I checked, Common Lisp, JavaScript and ML derived languages like Objective Caml are still real world, used at places like Google and Facebook.
>
> But I digress...
well, in the real world, a cat 'could' turn into mouse.
but only once all the molecules have dissipated (from death).
but whether those atoms will from new molecules, that create a mouse, nobody knows.
therefore, I cannot see why CLOS allows you to turn a cat into a mouse.
I can only surmise, that CLOS programmers like playing god ;-)
"playing god" != "OOP"
.. but i digress too ...
|