https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24513

Dennis <dkorpel@live.nl> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
                 CC|                            |dkorpel@live.nl
           Hardware|x86_64                      |All
         Resolution|---                         |INVALID
                 OS|Linux                       |All

--- Comment #1 from Dennis <dkorpel@live.nl> ---
This is defined behavior:

https://dlang.org/spec/function.html#auto-functions

> An auto function is declared without a return type. Auto functions can use any valid StorageClass, not just auto.

--

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24513

--- Comment #2 from basile-z <b2.temp@gmx.com> ---
that's completly stupid. Nobody would accept that in phobos. Just imagine my friend, someone who makes a PR that is like

```
pure takeWhile(T)(auto ref T t);
```

any human being would open a review comment to say

"why the heck dont you use auto"

and then you have the complete ashole who comes and say

> An auto function is declared without a return type. Auto functions can use any valid StorageClass, not just auto

that's absurd.

--