Thread overview | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
August 21, 2013 Re: Benchmarking a SIMD implementation of dot product | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Walter Bright | On 8/21/13 1:58 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
> http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/1ktue0/benchmarking_a_simd_implementation_of_dot_product/
Loosely related question I've always been curious about: are there people who follow this newsgroup but not the announce group?
Andrei
|
August 22, 2013 Re: Benchmarking a SIMD implementation of dot product | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Andrei Alexandrescu Attachments:
| Me... On 22 August 2013 07:11, Andrei Alexandrescu <SeeWebsiteForEmail@erdani.org>wrote: > On 8/21/13 1:58 PM, Walter Bright wrote: > >> http://www.reddit.com/r/**programming/comments/1ktue0/** benchmarking_a_simd_**implementation_of_dot_product/<http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/1ktue0/benchmarking_a_simd_implementation_of_dot_product/> >> > > Loosely related question I've always been curious about: are there people who follow this newsgroup but not the announce group? > > Andrei > > |
August 22, 2013 Re: Benchmarking a SIMD implementation of dot product | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Manu | On 2013-08-22 02:24, Manu wrote: > Me... I guess it's time you start :) -- /Jacob Carlborg |
August 22, 2013 Re: Benchmarking a SIMD implementation of dot product | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Andrei Alexandrescu | On Wednesday, 21 August 2013 at 21:11:48 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> Loosely related question I've always been curious about: are there people who follow this newsgroup but not the announce group?
>
Hi there. I assumed "announce" was for...well, announcements. Like official releases and such. Looking, I'm even sort of correct.
Incidentally, it may be kind of cool to aggregate release announcements of various D-related tools into a sidebar of the "Downloads & Tools" page or similar.
-Wyatt
|
August 22, 2013 Re: Benchmarking a SIMD implementation of dot product | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Jacob Carlborg Attachments:
| On 22 August 2013 17:24, Jacob Carlborg <doob@me.com> wrote:
> On 2013-08-22 02:24, Manu wrote:
>
>> Me...
>>
>
> I guess it's time you start :)
Surely there's nothing interesting there that doesn't end up here anyway? ;)
|
August 22, 2013 Re: Benchmarking a SIMD implementation of dot product | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
On 22 August 2013 15:59, Manu <turkeyman@gmail.com> wrote: > On 22 August 2013 17:24, Jacob Carlborg <doob@me.com> wrote: >> >> On 2013-08-22 02:24, Manu wrote: >>> >>> Me... >> >> >> I guess it's time you start :) > > > Surely there's nothing interesting there that doesn't end up here anyway? ;) I never announcement anything in here at least. ;-) -- Iain Buclaw *(p < e ? p++ : p) = (c & 0x0f) + '0'; |
August 22, 2013 Re: Benchmarking a SIMD implementation of dot product | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Manu | On 2013-08-22 15:59, Manu wrote: > Surely there's nothing interesting there that doesn't end up here anyway? ;) I assume the latest LDC release is completely uninteresting :). -- /Jacob Carlborg |
August 22, 2013 Re: Benchmarking a SIMD implementation of dot product | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Jacob Carlborg | On 22 August 2013 17:53, Jacob Carlborg <doob@me.com> wrote: > On 2013-08-22 15:59, Manu wrote: > >> Surely there's nothing interesting there that doesn't end up here anyway? ;) > > > I assume the latest LDC release is completely uninteresting :). > The what now? :o) -- Iain Buclaw *(p < e ? p++ : p) = (c & 0x0f) + '0'; |
August 22, 2013 Re: Benchmarking a SIMD implementation of dot product | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Jacob Carlborg Attachments:
| On 23 August 2013 01:53, Jacob Carlborg <doob@me.com> wrote:
> On 2013-08-22 15:59, Manu wrote:
>
> Surely there's nothing interesting there that doesn't end up here anyway?
>> ;)
>>
>
> I assume the latest LDC release is completely uninteresting :).
But surely I'd find that on the download page? ;)
|
Copyright © 1999-2021 by the D Language Foundation