On 23 May 2013 21:45, Jacob Carlborg <doob@me.com> wrote:

> On 2013-05-23 12:33, Manu wrote:
>
>  Is there an ETA for any any of these? case 3 is of critical
>> importance... and also 5. C executable, D dll, dynamically loaded (hot
>> swapping)
>>
>
> I don't know. 5 would probably automatically work if 3 worked, or with minor modifications. As for the ETA, I don't know. See if you can put some pressure Walter or Martin Nowak. I'm talking about Linux and possibly FreeBSD here. Don't know the status on Windows.


I think there's already some pressure on the 2 of them. It's been a major roadblock for a long time for us.

On 2013-05-23 13:57, Jakob Ovrum wrote:

> Hasn't pretty much all of this always worked on Windows?

I haven't tried it, I don't know.

-- 
/Jacob Carlborg

On 23 May 2013 21:57, Jakob Ovrum <jakobovrum@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Thursday, 23 May 2013 at 11:45:41 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
>
>> Don't know the status on Windows.
>>
>
> Hasn't pretty much all of this always worked on Windows?
>
> I've been using DLLs written in D on Windows for years, including in situations where they are loaded by a C application.
>
> It had its issues when it came to sharing TypeInfo and GC instances and whatnot, but it works.
>

They're not unimportant details.