Thread overview | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
July 18, 2016 [Issue 16282] Partial permutation/nextPermutation in std.algorithm | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16282 greenify <greeenify@gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |greeenify@gmail.com --- Comment #1 from greenify <greeenify@gmail.com> --- Does maybe mir.combinatorics help you? http://docs.mir.dlang.io/latest/mir_combinatorics.html I once tried to push for that to be included into Phobos, but there was too much resistance. I hope eventually we can move combinatorial back to Phobos. For more details: https://github.com/dlang/phobos/pull/4026 My argument at that time was that e.g. Python's itertools.product has 160K uses on github. -- |
July 19, 2016 [Issue 16282] Partial permutation/nextPermutation in std.algorithm | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16282 --- Comment #2 from Wyatt <wyatt.epp@gmail.com> --- I guess it might? It looks about how I had envisioned it, but I'm not really jazzed about the idea of installing an entire mathematics package for a one-off script I was expecting to take fifteen minutes. As for the reasoning, I just figured this was obvious? I mean, there probably isn't an introductory text on permutation that doesn't cover the constrained case. -- |
July 20, 2016 [Issue 16282] Partial permutation/nextPermutation in std.algorithm | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16282 --- Comment #3 from greenify <greeenify@gmail.com> --- > It looks about how I had envisioned it, but I'm not really jazzed about the idea of installing an entire mathematics package for a one-off script I was expecting to take fifteen minutes. Do you know about the new inline dub header? At least that's the tradeoff I am taking at the moment. #!/usr/bin/env dub /+ dub.sdl: name "foo" dependency "mir" version="0.15.3" +/ In any case I recommend making a bit of fuzz at the NG (forum.dlang.org) as this thread isn't monitored by many people. D developers are actually quite responsive to constructive feedback :) > As for the reasoning, I just figured this was obvious? Yes, when I needed it I was shocked too and thus wrote the small combinatorics module :/ -- |
December 17, 2022 [Issue 16282] Partial permutation/nextPermutation in std.algorithm | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16282 Iain Buclaw <ibuclaw@gdcproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|P3 |P4 -- |
Copyright © 1999-2021 by the D Language Foundation